HI Ted,
2012/11/14 Ted Dunning
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Sébastien Brisard <
> sebastien.bris...@m4x.org> wrote:
>
> > > There is no problem with the current setup of our website (at least,
> the
> >> website generated locally has no problem).
> >
> >
>
> For the new system, I would l
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Sébastien Brisard <
sebastien.bris...@m4x.org> wrote:
> > There is no problem with the current setup of our website (at least, the
>> website generated locally has no problem).
>
>
For the new system, I would like to step up, but I really (really) have
> no clue
Hi Gary,
2012/11/14 Gary Gregory
> I think you have to tell the compiler and javadoc plugin about the
> encoding.
>
> The thing I don't understand is that the encoding for the javadoc plugin
should default [1] to ${project.build.sourceEncoding} and
${project.reporting.outputEncoding} which are
I think you have to tell the compiler and javadoc plugin about the encoding.
Gary
On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:31, "Sébastien Brisard" wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Correction
>
>>
>> There is no problem with the current setup of our website (at least, the
>> website generated locally has no problem).
>>
>>
Hi again,
Correction
>
> There is no problem with the current setup of our website (at least, the
> website generated locally has no problem).
>
> I was sure of the contrary, but it turns out that the generated Javadoc
does not display UTF-8 characters correctly, although the following
propertie
Hello Luc,
2012/11/14 Luc Maisonobe
> Le 14/11/2012 07:53, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> > since the pom specifies the encoding of our source files as well as the
> > generated HTML files of the Javadoc, it occured to me that it is possible
> > to use UTF-8 characters
Le 14/11/2012 07:53, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi Sébastien,
> since the pom specifies the encoding of our source files as well as the
> generated HTML files of the Javadoc, it occured to me that it is possible
> to use UTF-8 characters in the Javadoc comments.
> I think using Γ instead o