Re: [math] TLP next steps

2016-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
I just kicked off the PMC membership recruiting thread. I think there are three more immediate things we need to do: 0) decide on a name for the new project 1) agree on initial PMC chair 2) draft a board resolution to form the new project Post-2), there will be lots of fun to have - scm, web sit

Re: [math] TLP next steps

2016-01-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2016-01-20 14:40 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > I think the next logical step is to determine who the members of the > new PMC and the new PMC chair will be. That information will need > to go in a Board resolution to actually form the new TLP. I suggest > that we start by asking for PMC volunteers a

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-15 Thread James Carman
Oh, I suppose you're right :) For some reason, I had it in my mind that he called a vote and not just a discussion. My bad. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:41 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > I did not know this was an official vote thread ;-) in any case, I do not > feel strongly for or against it. > > Ga

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-15 Thread Gary Gregory
I did not know this was an official vote thread ;-) in any case, I do not feel strongly for or against it. Gary On Jan 15, 2016 5:21 AM, "James Carman" wrote: > You didn't really register a vote here, Gary. I take it this is a -1 > against moving TLP? > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:24 PM Gary Gr

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-15 Thread James Carman
You didn't really register a vote here, Gary. I take it this is a -1 against moving TLP? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:24 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects in > Commons, that's not an issue IMO, just good project design. > > My main worr

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-15 Thread James Carman
So, do we count this as a +1 for Math to go TLP? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:04 PM Ole Ersoy wrote: > I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if it > gets all the repositories on github and enables the watch button as well as > github issues. > > Cheers, > Ole > > On 0

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-15 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top level > project at the ASF. This has been proposed before, and I have > always come down on the side of staying in Commons, but I am now > convinced that it is a good step for us to

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-14 Thread Henri Yandell
"Luc Maisonobe" > An: "Commons Developers List" > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2016 11:58:47 > Betreff: Re: [math] TLP > > Hi Phil, > > Le 14/01/2016 01:50, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top leve

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-14 Thread Siegfried Göschl
Hi folks, +1 for going TLP (non-binding) And the luck for Luc :-) Siegfried Goeschl - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Luc Maisonobe" An: "Commons Developers List" Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2016 11:58:47 Betreff: Re: [math] TLP Hi Phil, Le 14/01/2016 01:50,

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Phil, Le 14/01/2016 01:50, Phil Steitz a écrit : > I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top level > project at the ASF. This has been proposed before, and I have > always come down on the side of staying in Commons, but I am now > convinced that it is a good step for us to t

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-13 Thread Ole Ersoy
... and it looks like watch notifications for these are now enabled. Issues are still going through JIRA though. Cheers, Ole On 01/13/2016 08:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Commons projects that use Git like Math and Lang are already mirrored on GitHub, See: https://github.com/apache/commons-ma

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Commons projects that use Git like Math and Lang are already mirrored on GitHub, See: https://github.com/apache/commons-math https://github.com/apache/commons-lang Gary On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote: > I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-13 Thread Ole Ersoy
I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if it gets all the repositories on github and enables the watch button as well as github issues. Cheers, Ole On 01/13/2016 07:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-13 Thread Gary Gregory
I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects in Commons, that's not an issue IMO, just good project design. My main worry is more on the overall health of Commons or perception that [math] is "leaving" Commons, the more eyeballs on Commons the better. Gary On Wed, Jan 1

Re: [math] TLP

2016-01-13 Thread James Carman
+1 On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:50 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top level > project at the ASF. This has been proposed before, and I have > always come down on the side of staying in Commons, but I am now > convinced that it is a good step for us t