Now in SVN :)
Gary
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1 :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > Hi All:
> >> >
> >> > The message for the
+1 :)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not
>> mention
>> > the actual type, only the expe
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not
> mention
> > the actual type, only the expected type.
> >
> > Is there any objection to changing this?
> >
> > tr
On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not mention
> the actual type, only the expected type.
>
> Is there any objection to changing this?
>
> trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s"
>
> Proposal