Luc,
I would rather have them in a utility class (either MathUtils as
suggested or in MatrixUtils) than in ArrayRealVector which is not
devoted to provide utilities. ArrayRealVector can delegate its
computation to MathUtils/MatrixUtils since it has acces to its own
internal data and can provide
Le 11/08/2010 16:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> [...]
>>
>> It also appears that the Cartesian norm of a vector (in AbstractRealVector,
>> in AbstractLeastSquares, ...) does not care at all about overflow or
>> underflow. I thus translated enorm.f (minpack) into Java. My initial
>> intend was t
Le 11/08/2010 16:00, Dimitri Pourbaix a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> While fixing MATH-405, I noticed that some unit tests were failing with
> the corrected version! Obviously, some results against which those tests
> are competing were obtained ... with the bugged code. The usefulness of
> such tests is t
> [...]
>
> It also appears that the Cartesian norm of a vector (in AbstractRealVector,
> in AbstractLeastSquares, ...) does not care at all about overflow or
> underflow. I thus translated enorm.f (minpack) into Java. My initial
> intend was to put in AbstractLeastSquares but it might be more u
