On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
>>> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
>>> Seemed like a bug at first, but it
On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
>> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
>> Seemed like a bug at first, but it's not, because throws clauses are
>> only checked
On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
> Seemed like a bug at first, but it's not, because throws clauses are
> only checked at compile-time.
>
> So e.g. adding "throws IOExc
