Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: > >> >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > sebb wrote: > >> >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-03 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: >> >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > sebb wrote: >> >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > >> > sebb wrote: >> >> > >> >> On 31/12/

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-03 Thread sebb
On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: > >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > sebb wrote: > >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > >> > sebb wrote: > >> > >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wro

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> > sebb wrote: >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> > >> > sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> > >> >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > sebb wrote: >> >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this >> >> >>> a faile

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread sebb
On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: > On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > > sebb wrote: > > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > > >> > sebb wrote: > > >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > > >> >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consid

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread sebb
On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > sebb wrote: > >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this > >> >>> a failed VOTE and roll anoth

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> > sebb wrote: >> >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this >> >>> a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already >> >>> made in

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-02 Thread sebb
On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > sebb wrote: > >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this > >>> a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already > >>> made included and attempt a

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-01 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this >>> a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already >>> made included and attempt at clearer release notes and README. >>> >>> Thanks,

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > sebb wrote: >> On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this >>> a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already >>> made included and attempt at clearer release notes and README. >>> >>> Than

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-01 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this >> a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already >> made included and attempt at clearer release notes and README. >> >> Thanks, all for review and sorry t

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-01 Thread sebb
On 31/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this > a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already > made included and attempt at clearer release notes and README. > > Thanks, all for review and sorry to take so long to g

RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2009-12-31 Thread Phil Steitz
Comments have not changed sebb's -1, so I am going to consider this a failed VOTE and roll another RC with documentation fixes already made included and attempt at clearer release notes and README. Thanks, all for review and sorry to take so long to get this right. Phil Phil Steitz wrote: > Hope