4 08:23 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox component "Commons
> Text" with
> git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component)
> Le 09/11/2014 13:43, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> > How would you know t
bject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox component "Commons
Text" with
git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component)
Le 09/11/2014 13:43, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> How would you know that commons-text is a sandbox component? You would not
> if it is git, unless
Le 09/11/2014 13:43, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> How would you know that commons-text is a sandbox component? You would not
> if it is git, unless the URL has 'sandbox' in it.
It's a sandbox component because its site will state so. I still think
using a special directory layout or naming scheme for
Gary
>
> Benedikt
>
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message From: Benedikt Ritter <
> > brit...@apache.org> Date:11/09/2014 06:32 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox comp
hould even announce this on announce@. There my be other
> > >>> projects interested in a library like this (for example Apache Tika
> > [1])
> > >>> Good idea! Should we drop a note there once the project has been
> > created
> > >>> or a
05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox component "Commons
Text" with git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component)
INFRA issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8595
2014-11-07 16:17 GMT+01:00 Siegfried G
unce@. There my be other
> >>> projects interested in a library like this (for example Apache Tika
> [1])
> >>> Good idea! Should we drop a note there once the project has been
> created
> >>> or after we already have some code in there?
> >>>
> >>
> >
ed in a library like this (for example Apache Tika [1])
>>> Good idea! Should we drop a note there once the project has been created
>>> or after we already have some code in there?
>>>
>>
>> The latter seems appropriate to me.
>>
>>
>>>
;Commons Text"
> with git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component)
> Hi all,
>
> as disucssed, we'd like to create a new component which is focused on
> algorithms for string/text processing.
>
> We (= Bruno and I) would like to create this new com
+1, this is a better solution than stretching the scope of lang and
codec to include them. This would allow us to deprecate the language
package of codec and refocus it on data format conversions.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 07/11/2014 09:47, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> as disucssed, we'd lik
Go for it!
Gary
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:11/07/2014 03:47 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox component "Commons Text"
with git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component)
H
o me.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks!Bruno
>>
>>
>> From: Benedikt Ritter
>> To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P.
>> Kinoshita
>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component
>>
>> No objecti
seems appropriate to me.
>
> Thanks!Bruno
>
>
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita
>
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component
>
> No objections from my site. I think this
Thanks Luc! Wasn't aware of that one.
Bruno
From: Luc Maisonobe
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component
Le 27/10/2014 08:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> No objections from my site. I think this is a g
here once the project has been created or
after we already have some code in there?
Thanks!Bruno
From: Benedikt Ritter
To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component
No objections from my site
Le 27/10/2014 08:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> No objections from my site. I think this is a good idea. Just let me know
> if you need help with the bootstraping of the new project. Maybe we should
> even announce this on announce@. There my be other projects interested in a
> library like this (
No objections from my site. I think this is a good idea. Just let me know
if you need help with the bootstraping of the new project. Maybe we should
even announce this on announce@. There my be other projects interested in a
library like this (for example Apache Tika [1])
Benedikt
[1] http://tika
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: luc.maison...@free.fr [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:23
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [sandbox] new sandbox
Hi all,
-Original Message-
From: luc.maison...@free.fr [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:23
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [sandbox] new sandbox component
Hi all,
I have a
Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: [sandbox] new sandbox component
>>>
>>> Le 31/01/2011 20:13, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> > On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> >> Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>> >>> Does
Le 31/01/2011 21:22, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 14:52
>>> To: Commons Developers L
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 14:52
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [sandbox] new sandbox component
>>
&
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 31/01/2011 20:13, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component
like a [geometry]?
>>> G
> -Original Message-
> From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 14:52
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [sandbox] new sandbox component
>
> Le 31/01/2011 20:13, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> > On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, L
On 1/31/11, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 31/01/2011 19:49, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 1/31/11 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> +1, as long as your "seed code" is authored solely by yourself and
>>> cannot be claimed the property of any other entity, my ignorance of EU
>>> IP law notwithstanding.
>>>
my +1 for the sandbox proposal and interested also on contribute, even
if I'm too distracted by my Digester3 proposal :P
good work!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> +1, as long as your "seed code" is auth
Le 31/01/2011 20:13, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>> Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component
>>> like a [geometry]?
>> Good idea, thanks Gary, I'll start with geometry as the name. W
On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component like
>> a [geometry]?
> Good idea, thanks Gary, I'll start with geometry as the name. We can
> decide later if we include it in [math] o
Le 31/01/2011 19:49, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 1/31/11 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> +1, as long as your "seed code" is authored solely by yourself and
>> cannot be claimed the property of any other entity, my ignorance of EU
>> IP law notwithstanding.
>>
> Good point. I know Luc is well aware
Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component like
> a [geometry]?
Good idea, thanks Gary, I'll start with geometry as the name. We can
decide later if we include it in [math] or not. It will at least depend
on [math].
Luc
On 1/31/11 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> +1, as long as your "seed code" is authored solely by yourself and
> cannot be claimed the property of any other entity, my ignorance of EU
> IP law notwithstanding.
>
Good point. I know Luc is well aware of this, but I should have
added clean IP as a requ
+1, as long as your "seed code" is authored solely by yourself and
cannot be claimed the property of any other entity, my ignorance of EU
IP law notwithstanding.
Matt
On 1/31/11, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:23 AM, wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a bunch of code lying around
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:23 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a bunch of code lying around to deal with BSP trees (useful in
> different kinds of geometry modeling) and I would like to start a new sandbox
> component to improve it and maybe merge it back to [math] if useful or let it
> grow as
Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component like a
[geometry]?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: luc.maison...@free.fr [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:23
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [sandbox] new sandbox compone
34 matches
Mail list logo
