On 1/31/11 1:59 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 31/01/2011 17:46, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> Does that really fit in [math] or would it be better in a new component like >> a [geometry]? > Good idea, thanks Gary, I'll start with geometry as the name. We can > decide later if we include it in [math] or not. It will at least depend > on [math]. > Hey, last I checked geometry was a field within math :)
Phil > Luc > >> Gary >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:23 >>> To: Commons Developers List >>> Subject: [sandbox] new sandbox component >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have a bunch of code lying around to deal with BSP trees (useful in >>> different kinds of geometry modeling) and I would like to start a new >>> sandbox component to improve it and maybe merge it back to [math] if useful >>> or let it grow as a standalone component. >>> >>> Do you agree with the idea ? How do I start a new sandbox component ? >>> >>> best regards, >>> Luc >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
