Plus link to the javadoc and the release notes please. And maybe the license.
It's going to look like an xdoc page :)
Hen
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:04 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps there could be a maven plugin report for this? It could be
> configured in the pom?
>
>
Perhaps there could be a maven plugin report for this? It could be
configured in the pom?
1.0
01/01/1970
1.2
On 3/9/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > At this p
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At this point in time it seems that automating this comes with a few
> hazards, that needs to be fixed. Until that is done I propose that we
> advertise this manually in one of the site files.
I'll go as far as to s
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:21 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 09/03/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >> > On Sat, Mar 8,
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> >> Niall
On 09/03/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> >> Niall Pem
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> >> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> >> maven-project-info-
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (b
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> >> > mistake
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local r
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo
> > (sorry!).
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo
(sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Java
version on the dependencies page. The
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> maven-project-info-reports-plugin
sebb wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo
(sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to incl
Gary Gregory a écrit :
Really nice ! If you have some time to add Commons Configuration that
would be great.
Et hop: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html#commons-configuration-1.5
Thank you! The failure on Java 1.3 is not surprising (missing JDBC
classes that can't be fetched automat
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:12 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites
>
> Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > Feel fre
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Gary Gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free to use this compatibility information:
> http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html
> I run it from time to time or on demand.
Could you run it for the current trunk of lang as I think Henri's
gearing up for a r
Gary Gregory a écrit :
Feel free to use this compatibility information:
http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html
I run it from time to time or on demand.
Gary
Really nice ! If you have some time to add Commons Configuration that
would be great.
I'd love to have this kind of report for t
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberto
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I just re-published all the c
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> > > mistake) it had used a patched
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo
> (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the
Feel free to use this compatibility information:
http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html
I run it from time to time or on demand.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:38 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subje
On 3/5/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo
> (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Jav
33 matches
Mail list logo
