Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/20/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No major problems, however there are some items that can be improved: > > Dependency Listings entry: > > >>> > Commons Proxy > > Java library for dynamic proxying > > ../../../../../people.apache.org/www/commons.apache.org/proper/proxy/ > <<< > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

Niall Pemberton wrote: [snip] > I don't think this works with the release plugin - which is another > reason for doing it manually - one thing the plugin does is re-name > the scm entries in the pom.xml to reflect the tag. This is why Maven folks meanwhile use a stage plugin with a staging area.

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 21/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about creating a temporary page on the Commons Wiki with this > information? > > > > Once the process has been nailed down and tested, it should be moved > > to the formal website. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/21/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about creating a temporary page on the Commons Wiki with this information? > > Once the process has been nailed down and tested, it should be moved > to the formal website. > I like this idea! I can try to update it with anything I run into as I

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 17:43 +, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/20/0

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yup, sorry abo

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think > > > following this t

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think > > following this thread: > > http://commons.markmail.org/message/vw3ckyjakjgbdlbu > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, sorry about this - we changed process just over a year - I think > following this thread: > http://commons.markmail.org/message/vw3ckyjakjgbdlbu > > ...but no-one has go round to updating the docs. The other part of the > equation is

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

No major problems, however there are some items that can be improved: Dependency Listings entry: >>> Commons Proxy Java library for dynamic proxying ../../../../../people.apache.org/www/commons.apache.org/proper/proxy/ <<< Not sure where that originates, but it does not look right. Ideally th

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

A few suggestions for the next release (don't hold 1.0 just for this if you don't have the time) : - A tutorial with short code examples would be nice to get a quick taste of the API. The overview page is not very sexy, I'm not a proxy guru and I'm not sure to understand what I can achieve wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > You are right, the release instructions seem to be outdated in this area. > > > > It has become common practice to cut release candidates, tag them as >

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You are right, the release instructions seem to be outdated in this area. > > It has become common practice to cut release candidates, tag them as > such in subversion, but set the version numbers to the actual release > version. (Typical

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

James Carman schrieb: On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton schrieb: I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site ass

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton schrieb: > > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release > > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly"

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

Niall Pemberton schrieb: I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly" then the binary distro created also includes the javadocs and also -

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 20, 2008 4:32 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On Feb 20, 2008 4:32 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > > > that are going to be distributed. The di

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/19/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release > > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly" > then the binary distro created a

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc2)

I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly" then the binary distro created also includes the javadocs and also -sources.jar and -javadoc.ja