On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:d...@savarese.org]
>> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:50
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 ba
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>>
> Just a comment from me because my remark somehow started the whole discussion:
>
> As I pointed out with my +1 vote I do not see the lack of these jars as a
> blocker.
>
> However, I was a bit surprised that they were missing as it se
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>
> Am 19.11.2010 19:50, schrieb Daniel F. Savares
Am 19.11.2010 19:50, schrieb Daniel F. Savarese:
In message<02aa127cd8dcde48bc7d2dfb6c87083a07dda...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.
com>, Gary Gregory writes:
I do not think we should base decisions like this on a byte count, relative=
or not. I like to think of what users do with this stuff.
To
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:d...@savarese.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:50
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>
>
> In message <02aa127cd8dcde48bc7d2dfb6c8
On 19 November 2010 13:29, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 02:27, sebb a écrit :
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
>>
>> Changes since RC1 are:
>> - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive
>> - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives
>>
>> [ ] +1
Le 17/11/2010 02:27, sebb a écrit :
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
>
> Changes since RC1 are:
> - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive
> - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives
>
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, d
Le 19/11/2010 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 18:34
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>>
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 18:34
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>
> On 19 November 2010 02:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 1
Gregory
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> Rocket Software
>>> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
>>> Tel: +1.404.760.1560
>>> Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
>>> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
>>>
>>>
&g
Better add my vote before I forget ...
On 17 November 2010 01:27, sebb wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
>
> Changes since RC1 are:
> - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive
> - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [
ail: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 23:22
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
Build works fine with
iver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 23:22
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>>
>> Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
>>
>> The only nitpick I
are.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 23:22
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3
>
> Build works fine with JDK 1.5 o
sebb wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
>
> Changes since RC1 are:
> - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive
> - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives
>
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it becaus
On 11/18/10 5:04 AM, sebb wrote:
On 18 November 2010 07:22, Oliver Heger wrote:
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
The only nitpick I found is that the binary distribution does not contain
the source and Javadocs jar.
That's deliberate.
It contains the Javadocs
On 18 November 2010 07:22, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
>
> The only nitpick I found is that the binary distribution does not contain
> the source and Javadocs jar.
That's deliberate.
It contains the Javadocs as individual files, so inclu
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
The only nitpick I found is that the binary distribution does not
contain the source and Javadocs jar.
So +1.
Oliver
Am 17.11.2010 02:27, schrieb sebb:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3.
Changes si
18 matches
Mail list logo
