2015-04-19 17:41 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi,
>
> 3.4 has been released. GitHub badges have been activated. Now we can start
> the migration to git. Here is the Infra ticket [1]
>
The git mirror has been created at
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-lang.git
The SVN tree is now
Hi,
3.4 has been released. GitHub badges have been activated. Now we can start
the migration to git. Here is the Infra ticket [1]
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9478
2015-03-13 20:21 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> I like you'd plan!
>
> Gary :-)
>
> Orig
I like you'd plan!
Gary :-)
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:03/13/2015 11:17 (GMT-08:00)
To: Commons Developers List Cc:
Subject: [LANG] Next steps
Hi all,
I just want to give you an update on what I'm planning next for [lang].
- I'll review the pending pa
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello Hen
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>> > >
>> > > >
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm +1 for calendar defined minor releases btw. I think we should
2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Hen
> >
> >
> > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> >
> > > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want
> t
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Hen
>
>
> 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>
> > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
> > have a 3.3.
>
>
> I'm working on getting
Hello Hen
2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
> have a 3.3.
I'm working on getting 3.2.1 RC1 out of the door this weekend.
>
> I'm +1 for calendar defined
Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
have a 3.3.
I'm +1 for calendar defined minor releases btw. I think we should be
releasing monthly, if anyone has the energy to deal with the RMing :)
Also +1 to all.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1 to it all.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've successfully gone t
2014/1/2 Duncan Jones
> On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > +1 to it all.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Benedikt Ritter
> > Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [LANG] Next steps
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
>
On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1 to it all.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've successfully gone through my first release (w
+1 to it all.
Gary
Original message
From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [LANG] Next steps
Hi all,
I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had
expected it to be). I still have to do th
13 matches
Mail list logo
