Also +1 to all.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to it all. > > Gary > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Subject: [LANG] Next steps > > Hi all, > > I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had > expected it to be). I still have to do the Jira stuff, will do that tonight > probably. > So, here is what I have in mind for lang as next steps. > > Move User Guide from Website to package-info.java: > The user guide is structured in terms of packages in lang. It looks like > the package-info.java files are better suited for this kind of information. > Since Lang isn't a framework where multiple parts play together, I don't > see the need for a "real" user guide. > > Push out 3.2.1: > Although the two issues identified by Oliver and Jörg didn't block release > 3.2, I'd like to push out a bugfix (probably containing the above changes) > > Move to git: > We have talked about this a lot, and I had the feeling, that the people > working on [lang] are fine with moving to git. I'm planning to work out a > little guide on how to work on issues, create branches, create releases > using git. But this will probably take a while. > > Thoughts? > > Benedikt > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter >
