Hi,
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The project is completely different from other
> commons projects, because it contains platform native
> code beside java api.
Commons Daemon already does that and seems to cover some of the same
functionality. Would it make sense to merge
On 06.04.2009 21:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Sounds good. Who currently works on the Tomcat code and are they happy
> for it to come here as well.
Very basic commit statistics on repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni,
not including data about how big each of the commits was:
Count id
391 mturk
Sounds good. Who currently works on the Tomcat code and are they happy
for it to come here as well. Also has there been any interest from
other project committers (you mention mina)?
Niall
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is not official project manifest, just
Matt Benson wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Mladen Turk
Subject: Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
To: "Commons Developers List"
Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:59 AM
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
This sounds good to me as an initiative
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Mladen Turk wrote:
> From: Mladen Turk
> Subject: Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:59 AM
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> > This sounds good to me as an i
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
This sounds good to me as an initiative.
I am bit worried with the title apr (or is it acr?) since it overlaps a
lot with apache httpd's apr (which is widespread in many distributions
as one of the bases of httpd).
I thought the name should be (Apache Commons Runtime).
T
This sounds good to me as an initiative.
I am bit worried with the title apr (or is it acr?) since it overlaps
a lot with apache httpd's apr (which is widespread in many
distributions as one of the bases of httpd).
Wouldn't ajr be better a term since it's about a java binding?
Is tomcat nati
+1
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> +1 welcome!
>
> Phil
>
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is not official project manifest, just few things
> > so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
> > to settle in the commons at the first place.
> >
> > The project is comp
+1 welcome!
Phil
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all
This is not official project manifest, just few things
so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
to settle in the commons at the first place.
The project is completely different from other
commons projects, because it contains platform
+1
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is not official project manifest, just few things
> so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
> to settle in the commons at the first place.
>
> The project is completely different from other
> commons projects, because it contains platform nat
+1
Luc
Matt Benson a écrit :
> I would be +1 to include this in Commons.
>
> -Matt
>
> --- On Sat, 4/4/09, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> From: Mladen Turk
>> Subject: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
>> To: "Commons Developers List
+1 to the idea. Go for it :)
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is not official project manifest, just few things
> so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
> to settle in the commons at the first place.
>
> The project is completely different fro
I would be +1 to include this in Commons.
-Matt
--- On Sat, 4/4/09, Mladen Turk wrote:
> From: Mladen Turk
> Subject: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Saturday, April 4, 2009, 2:21 AM
> Hi all
>
&g
Hi all
This is not official project manifest, just few things
so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
to settle in the commons at the first place.
The project is completely different from other
commons projects, because it contains platform native
code beside java api.
The idea
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to create a new sandbox project.
Beyond using template from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/proposal/
what else is needed?
Not much more.
I suppose the PMC has to approve the project, etc.
Only through general list consensus - basi
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to create a new sandbox project.
> Beyond using template from
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/proposal/
>
> what else is needed?
Not much more.
> I suppose the PMC has to ap
Hi,
I'd like to create a new sandbox project.
Beyond using template from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/proposal/
what else is needed?
I suppose the PMC has to approve the project, etc.
However how that works for the existing Jakarta commiters?
Can we use ou
17 matches
Mail list logo
