On 06.04.2009 21:32, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Sounds good. Who currently works on the Tomcat code and are they happy > for it to come here as well.
Very basic commit statistics on repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni, not including data about how big each of the commits was: Count id 391 mturk 77 jfclere 15 markt 11 rjung 6 pero 5 remm 4 jim 2 wrowe 1 costin I'm personally fine with moving the Java API for APR to commons and think it's a nice environment to grow the feature set. I'm cross-posting to d...@tomcat for the the other committers. > Also has there been any interest from > other project committers (you mention mina)? > > Niall > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> This is not official project manifest, just few things >> so I can gather info weather the project has any chance >> to settle in the commons at the first place. >> >> The project is completely different from other >> commons projects, because it contains platform native >> code beside java api. >> >> The idea is to evolve the Tomcat Native to a >> standalone component. It is used by Apache Tomcat >> and Apache Mina projects, so we have two TLP >> projects already using it. >> And my plan is to use this component inside >> daemons project for common platform tasks. >> >> The java part will also have a special native >> library dynamic runtime, allowing the native >> module(s) to exist in the same jar and gets >> extracted at runtime depending on the JVM platform >> with all internal native dependencies resolved, >> thus liberating the user from .dll hell. >> >> So, thumbs up or down to pursue this, or do I >> need to find a different settlement :) >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> ^(TM) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
