Re: Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT

2016-05-26 Thread sebb
It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use >> > of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. >> > >> > Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? >> > >> > The following components contain a LIC

Re: Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT

2016-05-26 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
Mai 2016 um > 23:54: > > > Hi All: > > > > It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use > > of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. > > > > Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? > > > > The fol

Re: Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT

2016-05-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
+1 Gary Gregory schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 23:54: > Hi All: > > It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use > of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. > > Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? > > The foll

Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT

2016-05-25 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? The following components contain a LICENSE-header.txt: commons-beanutils commons-chain commons-codec