+1 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 23:54:
> Hi All: > > It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use > of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT. > > Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%? > > The following components contain a LICENSE-header.txt: > > commons-beanutils > commons-chain > commons-codec > commons-csv > commons-dbutils > commons-fileupload > commons-logging > commons-math4 > commons-pool2 > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
