Mohammady Mahdy wrote:
> Planning to do so :) will jump the JIRA once I return today, let me know if
> there is something specific I can help with.
cool
i don't have any specific tasks (other than JIRA) ATM but if anyone
does, hopefully they'll jump in...
- robert
-
Planning to do so :) will jump the JIRA once I return today, let me know if
there is something specific I can help with.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Mohammady Mahdy wrote:
> > Guys I am glad to see this project coming bac
Mohammady Mahdy wrote:
> Guys I am glad to see this project coming back to life, the viewvc and
> repository url on the site are broken though:
>
> jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk: unknown location
>
>
> Can you send the ones you are using ?
it takes a few hours for the site to sync: try
Guys I am glad to see this project coming back to life, the viewvc and
repository url on the site are broken though:
jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk: unknown location
Can you send the ones you are using ?
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Dave Meikle wrote:
> 2009/5/18 Niall Pemberton
2009/5/18 Niall Pemberton
> I made a couple of changes since some of what was in resources pom was
> duplicating what we already have in the commons-parent pom. The
> compiler "properties" you set to 1.5 are used in the parent to
> configure the compiler plugin. Also we tie the site and assembly
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Dave Meikle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/5/17 Dave Meikle
>
>> 2009/5/17 Robert Burrell Donkin
>>
>>> i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain
>>> a JDK1.5+ version.
>>>
>>> jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to sup
Hi,
2009/5/17 Dave Meikle
> 2009/5/17 Robert Burrell Donkin
>
>> i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain
>> a JDK1.5+ version.
>>
>> jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to support 1.4
>> but i'm happy to target 1.4 if there's a need.
>>
>
>
Hi,
2009/5/17 Robert Burrell Donkin
> i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain
> a JDK1.5+ version.
>
> jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to support 1.4
> but i'm happy to target 1.4 if there's a need.
>
+1 from me - that is what I had done
+1 to project.xml and build.xml going :)
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Dave Meikle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have
> moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to:
>
> * Refresh the License Headers
> * Added a Maven2 Bui
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dave Meikle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have
>> moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to:
>>
>> * Refresh the License Headers
>> * Added a Maven2 Build
>> * R
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dave Meikle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have
> moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to:
>
> * Refresh the License Headers
> * Added a Maven2 Build
> * Restructured the folders in-line w
Hi,
As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have
moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to:
* Refresh the License Headers
* Added a Maven2 Build
* Restructured the folders in-line with the standard maven folder structure
Because of the above change
12 matches
Mail list logo
