Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dave Meikle <loo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have >> moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to: >> >> * Refresh the License Headers >> * Added a Maven2 Build >> * Restructured the folders in-line with the standard maven folder structure >> >> Because of the above changes I have broken the existing Ant and Maven1 >> builds. Since we are at a stage of reactivation I was wondering what builds >> should we be supporting? >> >> Do we need both a Maven1 and Maven2 build? Would a Maven2 build suffice on >> its own? Or do we need at least Maven2 + Ant?
oops - just deleted the maven1 build (forgot i'd had this filter setup) if anyone wants it back, please jump in and i'll revert that patch > Its really down to what those that do the work want to maintain. The > only other factor is what JDK version is resources going to target - > if its pre-JDK1.5 then there might be a need for an ant build to be > able to test on that version. i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain a JDK1.5+ version. jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to support 1.4 but i'm happy to target 1.4 if there's a need. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
