Yes, I did a blind "git add ." and messed the codebase a bit at first.
Ole: Thanks for the tip, I'll check it out.
Great!
My plan is to implement a few simple end-to-end tests first, based on
Applied Mathematical Programming (http://web.mit.edu/15.053/www/), and then
refactor, implement more fine-
On 11/20/2013 07:16 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 05:43 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
>> Ok, I just pushed my code to the fork at
>> https://github.com/cherullo/commons-math.
>> Merging with SolutionCallback was straightforward, and the standard tests
>> passed.
>> I already saw issues in
I found this .gitignore info helpful when I first started with git:
http://www.vogella.com/articles/Git/article.html#d264321e1029
On 11/20/2013 12:16 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 11/20/2013 05:43 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
Ok, I just pushed my code to the fork at
https://github.com/cherullo/co
On 11/20/2013 05:43 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
> Ok, I just pushed my code to the fork at
> https://github.com/cherullo/commons-math.
> Merging with SolutionCallback was straightforward, and the standard tests
> passed.
> I already saw issues in the new code, but right now I'd like your opinion
> o
Ok, I just pushed my code to the fork at
https://github.com/cherullo/commons-math.
Merging with SolutionCallback was straightforward, and the standard tests
passed.
I already saw issues in the new code, but right now I'd like your opinion
on the current interface (ie. public SimplexSolution
optimiz
Hi guys,
It's been a while since I raised this issue. I actually solved this and I
want to contribute it back.
I implemented a new public method in SimplexSolver called optimizeExtra,
that returns a SimplexSolution containing:
1) PointValuePair solution;
The optimal solution.
2) HashMap extra
On 09/09/2013 10:37 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 09:02 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need to implement a way to recover some important information from
>> SimplexSolver's final tableau.
>> I'll start by the shadow price, which seems very straight forward. If I
>> under
On 09/09/2013 09:02 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to implement a way to recover some important information from
> SimplexSolver's final tableau.
> I'll start by the shadow price, which seems very straight forward. If I
> understand it correctly, I must:
> 1- Store the original Li
Hi.
[...]
B- I'm not confident enough that iterating a HashSet is fully
deterministic, nothing in the contracts says so.
If ordering is needed, we can change to a "TreeSet".
Gilles
[...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
Hi all,
I need to implement a way to recover some important information from
SimplexSolver's final tableau.
I'll start by the shadow price, which seems very straight forward. If I
understand it correctly, I must:
1- Store the original LinearConstraints in the same order as the normalized
constrain
10 matches
Mail list logo
