> From: gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
>> To: dev@commons.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:50:29AM +0300, marios michaelidis wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I will start with the tolera
th] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:50:29AM +0300, marios michaelidis wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> > I will start with the tolerance and Vif checks, because it is smaller and I
> > want to get familiar with th
tests that cover all functionalities?
Do they pass?
Best regards,
Gilles
> Regards
> Marios
> > From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:09:34 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks
> > To: dev@commons.
kages to determine variables that cause
multi-colinearity issues and should be excluded from the models"
Shall I just upload the class?
What else do I need to do?
Regards
Marios
> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:09:34 -0700
> Subject: Re: [math] Logistic, Pr
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/7/12 3:28 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >> Patches welcome!
> >>
> > Would normally love to, but I can't do more than kibitz based on other
> > implementations I have done.
> >
> OK, lets start with what Marios has and see where we can take it.
On 9/7/12 3:28 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>>> It might be interesting to think for a moment how easy it would be to
>>> support generalized linear regression in this same package. Small
>> changes
>>> to the loss function in the optimization shou
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > It might be interesting to think for a moment how easy it would be to
> > support generalized linear regression in this same package. Small
> changes
> > to the loss function in the optimization should allow you to have not
> just
> > logist
On 9/7/12 2:22 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> This is great.
>
> A very useful feature would be to allow basic L_1 and L_2 regularization.
>
> This makes it much easier to avoid problems with separable problems.
>
> It might be interesting to think for a moment how easy it would be to
> support generaliz
This is great.
A very useful feature would be to allow basic L_1 and L_2 regularization.
This makes it much easier to avoid problems with separable problems.
It might be interesting to think for a moment how easy it would be to
support generalized linear regression in this same package. Small c
that clustering is really any different, but it makes sense to find
> logistic "regerssion" in the a package named as such.
> Regards
> Marios
>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:48:12 +0200
>> From: gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
>> To: dev@commons.apache.org
e: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:48:12 +0200
> From: gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks
>
> Hi.
>
> >
> > My name is Marios and I have very good
> > academic background as
Hi.
>
> My name is Marios and I have very good
> academic background as well as I have worked as modeling analyst in big
> projects thus I have experience with prediction and optimization algorithms.
>
Welcome to Commons Math's forum.
>
> Recently (before 5 months) , I started
> learning JAV
Hi,
My name is Marios and I have very good
academic background as well as I have worked as modeling analyst in big
projects thus I have experience with prediction and optimization algorithms.
Recently (before 5 months) , I started
learning JAVA and I have made my life much more simple by u
13 matches
Mail list logo
