Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-15 Thread luc . maisonobe
- "Dimitri Pourbaix" a écrit : > Luc, > > > I think there are two parts in the isse. > > The first one is related to sparse matrix and we don't have an > answer > > yet. The second part is related to compute a partial set of > singular > > values. This is used for example in image compressi

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-14 Thread Ted Dunning
Computation of the largest few singular values (often associated with a partial set of singular vectors, either left, right or both) is very much the business of the SVD algorithm because computing just a few singular values is much more efficient than computing the entire set and often suffices ju

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-14 Thread Ted Dunning
For sparse matrices, almost the only requirement is a good dense SVD. If you have an SVD that is very fast for tall skinny matrices, that would be excellent. If not, that can be worked around. The basic idea is that right multiplication by a tall skinny random array (which is never stored explic

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-14 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Luc, I think there are two parts in the isse. The first one is related to sparse matrix and we don't have an answer yet. The second part is related to compute a partial set of singular values. This is used for example in image compression or to find a matrix with reduce rank that is the closest

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Dimitri Pourbaix a écrit : > Luc, > >> Concerning MATH-321, the partial fix I proposed has been withdrawn by >> the complete rewrite of SVD. >> This partial fix also was not considered mathematically sound by Dimitri >> since the dimensions of the matrices did not match complete SVD. Well, >> this

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-14 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Luc, Concerning MATH-321, the partial fix I proposed has been withdrawn by the complete rewrite of SVD. This partial fix also was not considered mathematically sound by Dimitri since the dimensions of the matrices did not match complete SVD. Well, this was in fact desired as MATH-321 explicitly

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-13 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > Phil Steitz wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >>> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Phil S

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-13 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: >> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: >>> - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : >>> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Steitz resolved MATH-282. ---

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > >> [...] OLS regression (350 - good catch!) also >> obviously needs to be fixed. Thanks to all for testing. > > There is indeed a difference from what CM 2.0 computed but maybe that it is > not a problem after all, and is just to be expected from the implementatio

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > [...] OLS regression (350 - good catch!) also > obviously needs to be fixed. Thanks to all for testing. There is indeed a difference from what CM 2.0 computed but maybe that it is not a problem after all, and is just to be expected from the implementation change: some failing tests compar

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan [WAS: Re: [jira] Resolved: (MATH-282) ChiSquaredDistributionImpl.cumulativeProbability > 1]

2010-03-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: >> - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : >> >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>> ] >>> >>> Phil Steitz resolved MATH-282. >>> -- >>

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > >> [...] >> >>> With this fix, there are no pending issues for 2.1. Gilles is working on >>> two unscheduled issues. >>> I suggest once he has committed the fixes, we can go ahead to release 2.1. >>> >>> Any thoughts about this ? >> First, let me volunteer to RM.

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > [...] > > > With this fix, there are no pending issues for 2.1. Gilles is working on > > two unscheduled issues. > > I suggest once he has committed the fixes, we can go ahead to release 2.1. > > > > Any thoughts about this ? > > First, let me volunteer to RM. [...] May I suggest to

[math] 2.1 Release plan [WAS: Re: [jira] Resolved: (MATH-282) ChiSquaredDistributionImpl.cumulativeProbability > 1]

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: > - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : > >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >> Phil Steitz resolved MATH-282. >> -- >> >> Resolution: Fixed >