On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>> wrote:
>>> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
1/ FastDateFormat
The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
>>
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> 1/ FastDateFormat
>>> The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
>>> 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat fo
Hi Paul,
Paul Benedict wrote:
> You sure it's not a bug in the JDK? Just asking. The results are curious.
I asked that myself. Javadoc of the JDK can be interpreted this way.
- Jörg
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrot
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> 2/ UnicodeUnescaper
> Since JDK 1.7 "\u+" is a valid Unicode representation. The
> UnicodeUnescaper defines the OPTION "escapePlus" that allows also this plus
> character for all runtime versions i.e. currently the OPTION is superfluous
You sure it's not a bug in the JDK? Just asking. The results are curious.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> 1/ FastDateFormat
>> The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
>> 2003" instead of
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> 1/ FastDateFormat
>> The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
>> 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat follow the JDK
>> in any case an
On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> 1/ FastDateFormat
> The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03
> 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat follow the JDK
> in any case and adjust its result according the runtime? Interestingly
> Javadoc
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Heads up that I plan to tag and build an RC4 tomorrow.
>
> Commit now, or raise your hand if you need me to delay.
I have a look into the two JDK 7 problems. What do you all recommend?
1/ FastDateFormat
The date format " yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "
Heads up that I plan to tag and build an RC4 tomorrow.
Commit now, or raise your hand if you need me to delay.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.ap
