On 15/03/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:32 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
&
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:32 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
> On 15/03/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > -Original
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:58 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>> I've just discovered one minor issue - EntriesPerformanceTest. This is
>> in the main lang directory, but not in the LangTestSuite -
>> deliberately, I suspect, as it take over 100 seconds on my
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:31 AM, sebb wrote:
> I've just discovered one minor issue - EntriesPerformanceTest. This is
> in the main lang directory, but not in the LangTestSuite -
> deliberately, I suspect, as it take over 100 seconds on my system.
>
> Perhaps it could be moved into a different pac
On 15/03/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 8:05 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 8:05 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Gary Gregory
>
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> From: Gary Gregory
> Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 2:39 PM
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Benson [mai
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:29 PM
>> To: dev@commons.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what'
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> >>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:21 AM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's ou
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> >> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>> >> >
>>
>> >> > And the various other backwards incompatible changes that people have
>> >> > been requesting.
>>
Sure. Split on a new thread, or if the previous thread ended up with
good concrete direction then make JIRA tickets and add patches. [Not
that you shouldn't commit... adding a patch on JIRA first seems to
work well for discussions].
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> May I rep
Process:
* Mail list if you want feedback to sanity check the idea. If it survives that:
* Open up a JIRA ticket, post the code as a patch, discuss :)
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect subpackage, to provide as much
> help as pos
On 14/03/2009, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
> >> To: Commons Developers List
> >> Subject: Re: [lang] 3
Jorg, nothing is wrong with that. I missed that option. Thanks for
pointing it out.
Paul
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> May I repeat my proposal [1] to add some utility classes related to
> concurrency?
>
> Oliver
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org
May I repeat my proposal [1] to add some utility classes related to
concurrency?
Oliver
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg08095.html
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (
Paul Benedict wrote:
> I am -1 on removing the enums package. It's still a useful design
> pattern even if Java 5 has native enum support. As one of the
> responsers noted, and as do I, I have used Apache Enum extensively and
> would not put the burden on developers to remove it just yet.
> Deprec
Gary Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>> >
>> > And the var
I am -1 on removing the enums package. It's still a useful design
pattern even if Java 5 has native enum support. As one of the
responsers noted, and as do I, I have used Apache Enum extensively and
would not put the burden on developers to remove it just yet.
Deprecate the package for 3.0 and kill
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:36 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
>
> --- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:52 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
> On 14/03/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Starting up a t
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> From: Gary Gregory
> Subject: RE: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 2:19 PM
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gud
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:21 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
> Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
Thanks fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 11:57 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what's out
>
>
> I'd like to add a TypeUtils to the reflect s
nable test would
normally be used in preparation for e.g. a reflection-based method call
autoboxing should have been a safe assumption to begin with, but anyway...).
-Matt
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: [lang] 3.0, what's in; what'
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a branch, it lives
at the same level as trunk and will need its future to be decided
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Fraction is up for debate. Do we cede this to Commons Math. Sure it
might add another jar to some people's code, but probably good for
them to be more aware of Math.
There is already a Fraction class in [math]. I'm not sure if it should
be removed from [lang]. If it was put
Henri Yandell a écrit :
> Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
>
> I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
> to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
> lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a branch, it lives
On 14/03/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
>
> I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
> to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
> lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a b
FYI, I've removed the LangTwo 1.0 version from JIRA.
3.0 is the place to work on those features. We can then solve naming
when we're ready to release.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
-
Starting up a thread for cleanup discussions on Lang.
I've removed the enum (was a blocker on JDK 5) and enums (people need
to use real enums now) packages from Lang's trunk and moved them to a
lang-backcompat sibling component. I've not made it a branch, it lives
at the same level as trunk and wi
31 matches
Mail list logo
