Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Tim O'Brien wrote: > >>> On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Matt Benson wrote:

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Matt Benson wrote: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tim O'Brien wrote: On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: Thanks for your response, Dennis: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread simon
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 13:48 -0700, Matt Benson wrote: > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I sense I'll not be able to escape M(1|2). Groan, I > was hoping to avoid M2 for some time yet... Let me do > some research to see exactly what I'm getting into if > I opt to switch JXPath.

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim O'Brien wrote: > > On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Matt Benson wrote: > Thanks for your response, Dennis: > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > > Thanks for your response, Dennis: > > > > > > > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread simon
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:23 -0700, Matt Benson wrote: > Is the fact that the sites can be made uniform the > driving reason to use Maven 1 or 2? If, > hypothetically speaking, there were a third option > that could generate the site identically, would there > be a good reason to forbid its use?

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Tim O'Brien wrote: On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: Thanks for your response, Dennis: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven 1.0.2. It looks as go

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Tim O'Brien
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > Thanks for your response, Dennis: > > > > > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> The site for jxpath builds fine for me using > > Maven > > >>

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > Thanks for your response, Dennis: > > > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The site for jxpath builds fine for me using > Maven > >> 1.0.2. It looks as > >> good as any of the other components sites

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Matt Benson wrote: Thanks for your response, Dennis: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven 1.0.2. It looks as good as any of the other components sites that are build with M1. Which reports that are generated is configured in the

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
Thanks for your response, Dennis: --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven > 1.0.2. It looks as > good as any of the other components sites that are > build with M1. > > Which reports that are generated is configured in > the section

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I > > don't think magic has much place in the realm of > > software development. For this reason I > despair--and > > I say this in awareness th

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/3/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I > > don't think magic has much place in the realm of > > software development. For this reason I despair--and > > I say this in awareness

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven 1.0.2. It looks as good as any of the other components sites that are build with M1. Which reports that are generated is configured in the section of the file project.xml. Most of the plugins in Maven 1 can be tweaked by adding or changing pr

Re: [jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I > don't think magic has much place in the realm of > software development. For this reason I despair--and > I say this in awareness that I may offend some > folks--whenever I am forced to work wi

[jxpath/all] Maven site help

2007-08-03 Thread Matt Benson
Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I don't think magic has much place in the realm of software development. For this reason I despair--and I say this in awareness that I may offend some folks--whenever I am forced to work with Maven. I can never figure out what's going on, and any d