On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 February 2011 22:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 2/18/11 2:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I agree it's helpful to have at least the subject of the JIRA in the
>>> log message, but IMO there should be nothing in the log message that
>>> is not in the JIRA
and/or
> descriptions in JIRA.
Agree, duplication is not a problem.
> Phil
>> S.
>> On 18 February 2011 17:22, henrib wrote:
>>> Sorry about that; will do. Got it reversed between what I write in Jira and
>>> in the svn log.
>>> Regards,
>>>
Phil
> S.
> On 18 February 2011 17:22, henrib wrote:
>> Sorry about that; will do. Got it reversed between what I write in Jira and
>> in the svn log.
>> Regards,
>> Henrib
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-commons.680414
sed between what I write in Jira and
> in the svn log.
> Regards,
> Henrib
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Re-jexl-Short-description-in-commit-messages-was-svn-commit-r1072000-tp3312834p3313182.html
> Sent from the Commo
Sorry about that; will do. Got it reversed between what I write in Jira and
in the svn log.
Regards,
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/Re-jexl-Short-description-in-commit-messages-was-svn-commit-r1072000-tp3312834p3313182.html
Sent from the
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:06 AM, wrote:
> Author: henrib
> Date: Fri Feb 18 14:06:47 2011
> New Revision: 1072000
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072000&view=rev
> Log:
> JEXL-83
>
Can you please add a short sentence or two to future commit messages
about the changes? (in addition to
