Looks like it worked!
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 25 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 12 01:33:42 UTC 2011
Bill-
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:44 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 00:37, Bill Speir
On 12 December 2011 00:37, Bill Speirs wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, sebb wrote:
>> You changed the pom to require a minimum of Java 1.6, but the
>> Continuum build has yet to be updated.
>
> How should I have updated the Continuum build?
Continuum is not exactly easy to configure (*
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> You changed the pom to require a minimum of Java 1.6, but the
> Continuum build has yet to be updated.
How should I have updated the Continuum build?
Thanks for the help...
Bill-
On 11 December 2011 19:27, William Speirs wrote:
> Clearly I did something wrong:
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?projectId=74&projectName=&buildId=15727&projectGroupId=0
You changed the pom to require a minimum of Java 1.6, but the
Continuum build has yet to be updated.
Clearly I did something wrong:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?projectId=74&projectName=&buildId=15727&projectGroupId=0
Also, how can I manually kick-off a contunuum build and/or simulate
that environment on my computer? It builds and tests without error on
my system.
Thank
On 8 December 2011 18:59, William Speirs wrote:
> Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are
> all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but
> without an "official" -1.
>
> When I get a chance, I'm going to change the pom to require Java 1.6
> and make
Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are
all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but
without an "official" -1.
When I get a chance, I'm going to change the pom to require Java 1.6
and make a note in the changes.xml file as well. If that builds with
Hi!
>
> Reading more, this (getSQLXML) sounds like a good reason to move to Java 1.6.
>
> DB code is tied to JDBC, which is tied to version of Java. Java 5 is
> dead and the only reason I'd heard to consider 5 was Android, which
> doesn't feel like it should a big database client codebase.
>
> So
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 4 December 2011 17:13, William Speirs wrote:
>>> What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from
>>
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
>>
>>> 1.4 to
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 December 2011 17:13, William Speirs wrote:
>> What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
>
>> 1.4 to 1.5 too small of a version number bump to require a different
On 4 December 2011 17:13, William Speirs wrote:
> What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from
http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
> 1.4 to 1.5 too small of a version number bump to require a different
> version of Java? Would we need to wait until 2.0 to
What is the "rule" on when you can switch Java versions? Is going from
1.4 to 1.5 too small of a version number bump to require a different
version of Java? Would we need to wait until 2.0 to switch to Java
1.6?
Thanks...
Bill-
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 December 2011 1
On 3 December 2011 18:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, William Speirs wrote:
>
>> I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is
>> that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires
>> importing java.sql.SQLXML which was introduced in Java
On 2011-12-03, William Speirs wrote:
> I also added my fingerprint to LDAP and I've created a RDF file as
> well, but again I don't yet see my info here:
> http://people.apache.org/committers.html Again, I'm guessing/hoping
> that it just takes a while to perform the sync.
There are a bunch of sh
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, William Speirs wrote:
> I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is
> that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires
> importing java.sql.SQLXML which was introduced in Java 1.6.
>
> Currently DBUTILS is set to only require Ja
>
> OK... I think I've created a GPG code signing key and updated all the
> proper documents. I'm a bit worried I did something wrong because my key
> does show up here: http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS but I'm
> guessing/hoping it just takes time to sync things up. I updated that file
> on
I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is
that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires
importing java.sql.SQLXML which was introduced in Java 1.6.
Currently DBUTILS is set to only require Java 1.5.
Thoughts?
Bill-
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simone
On 29 November 2011 07:48, wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>>I think you just PGP with your release key. Later on we can strengthen
>>the signing by adding you to the web-of-trust.
>
> +1. Don't forget to add your public key to the KEYS file. That is a must.
> Being in the web of trust is a (ve
Henri Yandell wrote:
>I think you just PGP with your release key. Later on we can strengthen
>the signing by adding you to the web-of-trust.
+1. Don't forget to add your public key to the KEYS file. That is a must. Being
in the web of trust is a (very) nice to have.
Mark
>Hen
>
>On Mon, Nov 28
I think you just PGP with your release key. Later on we can strengthen
the signing by adding you to the web-of-trust.
Hen
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, William Speirs wrote:
> I haven't forgotten about this... been tied up at work with a new employee.
>
> One potential issue though, I have no
I haven't forgotten about this... been tied up at work with a new employee.
One potential issue though, I have not created an Apache PGP key yet, so I
will not have a chance to get it signed by anyone. What is the protocol for
getting one's key signed?
Thanks...
Bill-
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:
Hi Bill,
Continuum just notified a build failure :P
If you intend to cut a new release, read our `Creating Releases` page
on wiki[1], count on me if you need help (I was the last on cutting a
DbUtils release)
Have a nice weekend, all the best!
Simo
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleas
Does anyone have thoughts on releasing commons-dbutils 1.5? There are
5 changes since 1.4 (issues 84, 77, 73, 67, and 66), and I think
that's probably enough to warrant a new release.
I'm new to this whole process, so I'm unsure as to what to do next.
Thanks...
Bill-
---
23 matches
Mail list logo
