Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but without an "official" -1.
When I get a chance, I'm going to change the pom to require Java 1.6 and make a note in the changes.xml file as well. If that builds with Continuum, then I'll attempt to cut an RC release. Thanks to everyone for their help/guidance... Bill- On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi! > >> >> Reading more, this (getSQLXML) sounds like a good reason to move to Java 1.6. >> >> DB code is tied to JDBC, which is tied to version of Java. Java 5 is >> dead and the only reason I'd heard to consider 5 was Android, which >> doesn't feel like it should a big database client codebase. >> >> So +1 to moving to Java 6. >> >> Hen >> > > that sound valid reasons to me too, +1 :) > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
