+1. The release was/is fine :)
On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Thanks Rainer.
I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything
works then.
I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
a broker link... right guys?
Thanks aga
I realize this thread went the wrong direction.
Why the green? Just noticed Taglibs has the same problem (it uses the
Commons CSS :) ). Very ugly. Presumably we used to use a different
colour and the CSS has been changed?
Hen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Christi
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo.
+1. I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll
releases. I also favor having the www website focussed on current
de
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo.
>>
>
> +1. I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll
> releases. I also favor having the www website focussed on current
> development, with prior
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote:
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> > green "1.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, May
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem
On 23/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1.
> >
> > One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's
> > completely meaningless and just leads to confusion.
> >
> > I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your
> > doc
>> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1.
>
> One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's
> completely meaningless and just leads to confusion.
>
> I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your
> documentation. However websites serve a completely different purpo
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> >> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
>> generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site
>> is generated).
>
On 23/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> >> > On 22
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> >> >> > Ano
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> >> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
> >> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
> >> > ge
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
>> > generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't c
On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
> > generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site
> > is generated).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
> green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
> generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site
> is generated).
Thanks, but it looks like "know issue":
http://wiki.apache.org/co
On 22/05/2009, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 22.05.2009 00:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary
> > cgi works now too :-)
>
>
> Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
> green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which
On 22.05.2009 00:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary
> cgi works now too :-)
Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the
generating style sheet or an an
thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary
cgi works now too :-)
Cheers
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.05.2009 22:58, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Thanks Rainer.
>> I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works
>> then.
>
> I
On 21.05.2009 22:58, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks Rainer.
> I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then.
I just noticed another minor glitch in the site docs version at
people.apache.org. There is still a file downloads.html, that contains
the info "There a
On 21/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks Rainer.
> I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works
> then.
> I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
> a broker link... right guys?
The site can be fixed without redoing the vote,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Thanks Rainer.
> I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then.
> I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
> a broker link... right guys?
>
Right.
-Rahul
> Perhaps you just mistyped, but the correlation isn't between
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons and repo1, rather its between
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ and repo1.
> Since the artifacts were added to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository a
> few hours ago, I'd wait a
Thanks Rainer.
I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then.
I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just
a broker link... right guys?
Thanks again,
Christian
> Concerning the download page:
>
> I think you need to add the cgi page named
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
>
> Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.
> http://r
On 21.05.2009 19:24, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
>
> Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.
> http://repo1.maven.
Hi,
I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-compress/commons-compress/
doesn't contain it
30 matches
Mail list logo
