Re: [codec] getting to ready to RC 1.7

2012-03-28 Thread sebb
On 28 March 2012 19:29, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 March 2012 17:14, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Hi All: >> > >> > If there is anything you're itching to for for codec 1.7, now is the >> time. >> >> Any comments on CODEC-96 ? >> Base64 encode() me

Re: [codec] getting to ready to RC 1.7

2012-03-28 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 March 2012 17:14, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > If there is anything you're itching to for for codec 1.7, now is the > time. > > Any comments on CODEC-96 ? > Base64 encode() method is no longer thread-safe, breaking clients > using

Re: [codec] getting to ready to RC 1.7

2012-03-28 Thread sebb
On 28 March 2012 17:50, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/28/2012 06:47 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 28 March 2012 17:14, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Hi All: >>> >>> If there is anything you're itching to for for codec 1.7, now is the time. >> >> Any comments on CODEC-96 ? >> Base64 encode() method is no longe

Re: [codec] getting to ready to RC 1.7

2012-03-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/28/2012 06:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 March 2012 17:14, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hi All: >> >> If there is anything you're itching to for for codec 1.7, now is the time. > > Any comments on CODEC-96 ? > Base64 encode() method is no longer thread-safe, breaking clients > using it as a shared B