[RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-24 Thread Oliver Heger
The vote to release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1 has passed with the following votes (all binding): Benedikt: +1 Luc:+1 Emmanuel: +1 Oliver: +1 No other votes were cast. Thanks to all for reviews and comments. Oliver Am 20.03.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Ol

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 20/03/2016 22:42, Oliver Heger a écrit : > [X] +1 Release these artifacts Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/03/2016 01:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Is this a deal breaker for your use cases? No it isn't, I can keep wrapping every Configuration into a DataConfiguration, but I hoped the 2.0 release could be the opportunity to simplify this. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-23 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Thank you very much pushing [configuration] forward Oliver. I haven't > looked at [configuration] for a long time, my needs are rather basic and > a mere read-only PropertiesConfiguration is good enough for me. There is > one change though

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-23 Thread Oliver Heger
My +1 Oliver Am 20.03.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to > release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the > corresponding release vote. > > Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Emmanuel, Am 22.03.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Thank you very much pushing [configuration] forward Oliver. I haven't > looked at [configuration] for a long time, my needs are rather basic and > a mere read-only PropertiesConfiguration is good enough for me. There is > one change tho

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-22 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thank you very much pushing [configuration] forward Oliver. I haven't looked at [configuration] for a long time, my needs are rather basic and a mere read-only PropertiesConfiguration is good enough for me. There is one change though I hoped could get into 2.0, that was the integration of DataConfi

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-22 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 20/03/2016 22:42, Oliver Heger a écrit : > Hi all, > > after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to > release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the > corresponding release vote. > > Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: > https://d

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 22.03.2016 um 01:32 schrieb James Carman: > +1 drop ant So we agree on this one. What about the actual vote? (Nudge, nudge) Oliver > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Hi Benedikt, >> >> Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >>> Hello Oliver, >>> >>> v

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-21 Thread James Carman
+1 drop ant On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Benedikt, > > Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hello Oliver, > > > > very nice artifacts, good work. > > > > - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 > > - site looks good > > - reports look good > > > > Only thing I fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-21 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 to drop ant. Gary On Mar 21, 2016 2:24 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > Le 21/03/2016 22:06, Oliver Heger a écrit : > > > maintaining two different build files is a pain and error-prone. The > > trend seems to be dropping the ant build. I would be in favor of this. > > +1 for dropping the Ant bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 21/03/2016 22:06, Oliver Heger a écrit : > maintaining two different build files is a pain and error-prone. The > trend seems to be dropping the ant build. I would be in favor of this. +1 for dropping the Ant build. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Benedikt, Am 21.03.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > very nice artifacts, good work. > > - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 > - site looks good > - reports look good > > Only thing I found is: > - build.xml and build.properties.sample are in the tag but not in the src > a

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Oliver, very nice artifacts, good work. - builds with java 6, 7 and 8 - site looks good - reports look good Only thing I found is: - build.xml and build.properties.sample are in the tag but not in the src archive. The ant build can probably be dropped (does it work anyway?). No blocker for

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

2016-03-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the corresponding release vote. Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration (revisio