>
> >> Could we change the default for *all* types of text files including java
> >> source files to UTF-8 ?
>
+1
Also in [math] it would be interesting to use some symbols and some
> greek characters in javadoc and have them both readable when editing the
> file and converted automatically into
Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>
>> Could we change the default for *all* types of text files including java
>> source files to UTF-8 ?
>
> +1, but does it really matter in Commons where the source files are in
> english anyway?
This one is not in english and the unicode esca
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Could we change the default for *all* types of text files including java
source files to UTF-8 ?
+1, but does it really matter in Commons where the source files are in
english anyway?
Emmanuel Bourg
--
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[snip]
> More on the 2.4.1 src assembly version here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/wqqs67eyi6hq3mcq
>
> -Rahul
Time to upgrade Maven then :))
BTW: Which is the minimal JDK version for net-1.5.0 ?
Additionally:
build.xml sets title of javadoc to "Apache Commons Net
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Rory Winston wrote:
>
>> (As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
>>
>> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
>>
>> Binaries/sources etc:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC4/
>
Rory Winston wrote:
> (As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
>
> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
>
> Binaries/sources etc:
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC4/
>
> Fixes:
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> Yes, it can go in the parent, but AFAIK the component pom will still
> need to be changed to point to the new parent.
Right. We'd have to make sure everyone is using the new parent (we
always have to do that when we upgrade)
On 22/07/2009, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > The POM needs to specify the encoding.
>
>
> Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or
> something?
Yes, it can go in the parent, but AFAIK the component pom will still
need to
+1
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Could we change the default for *all* types of text files including java
> source files to UTF-8 ?
>
--
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve
James Carman a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote:
>> The POM needs to specify the encoding.
>
> Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or
> something?
Allow me to jump here and ask a more general question.
The default encoding in the parent pom is i
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> The POM needs to specify the encoding.
Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or something?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
On 21/07/2009, Rory Winston wrote:
> (As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
NOTICE.txt has:
Copyright 2001-2008
This needs to be updated to -2009.
The first year disagrees with inceptionYear in pom.xml - on
(As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
Binaries/sources etc: http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC4/
Fixes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310487&fi
On 26/10/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> A commons-net 1.5.0 RC has been tagged, and available for review at
Is the correct tag NET_1_5_0_RC1 ?
There are two other tags:
NET_1_5_0_RC2
NET_1_5_0_RC3
which seem to be older than RC1.
That's very confusing. I assume RC1
Hi all
A commons-net 1.5.0 RC has been tagged, and available for review at
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC1/
Please vote for release as you feel appropriate.
Thanks
Rory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
Just realised why the Feb29 tests are not passing - not all the
relevant NET-188 patches have been applied. I'll fix trunk.
Also, the tests fail on Java 1.4.1 as well.
The tests pass on Java 1.5.0, which is presumably why you did not see
the failures.
On 07/04/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Not sure, but they are certainly tests that need to pass.
I'm looking at how to fix them now.
The 1.5 build still contains the proposal/ftp2 tree.
This has been removed from 2.0 - should it not be removed from 1.5 as well?
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are they the te
are they the tests that you added?
sebb wrote:
On 06/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a maintenance
release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons
On 06/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a maintenance
> release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/changes-report.html
>
>
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/changes-report.html
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/comm
20 matches
Mail list logo
