Hi all,
due to binary backward compatibility violation - introduced by myself
:P - the actual vote can be considered cancelled.
I'll cut a new RC tomorrow morning, thanks everybody who took part to
the review!
All the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.live
my bad and apologize guys, I'll cut a new RC tomorrow!!!
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The problem was introduced 3 weeks ago in r1227700 when ResultStatus was
changed from being an inner class to a static inner class.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1227700
I've committed a deprecated, overloaded constructor for t
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>> I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am not
>> sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
>> build.properties. This is not mentioned in the buil
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote:
I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am
not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
build.properties. This is not mentioned in the building instructions,
and build.xml tries to download some librar
Hi Oliver!
unfortunately I just provided my help on cutting the RC - I cc'ed Nick
who's the last mastermind behind [validator], hopefully is just a
missing note!!
Thanks for reviewing!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simon
Hi Simone,
the build with Maven runs fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and
side look good.
I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am
not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
build.properties. This is not mentioned in the buil
this is my +1, I reviewed all the steps, I'm quite comfortable this RC is fine
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Simone Tripodi wrote:
as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the
[validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons
validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details:
Artifacts look good to me, I'm +1
Nick
---
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Hi Seb,
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC1/
>
> That tag is not unique, as it was recreated.
> So please
On 27 January 2012 09:49, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Good morning all mates :)
>
> as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the
> [validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons
> validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details:
>
> Tag:
>
>
> https://svn.apac
Good morning all mates :)
as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the
[validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons
validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details:
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC
12 matches
Mail list logo
