Hi all,
due to binary backward compatibility violation - introduced by myself
:P - the actual vote can be considered cancelled.

I'll cut a new RC tomorrow morning, thanks everybody who took part to
the review!

All the best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/



On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> my bad and apologize guys, I'll cut a new RC tomorrow!!!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Nick Burch <nick.bu...@alfresco.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem was introduced 3 weeks ago in r1227700 when ResultStatus was
>>> changed from being an inner class to a static inner class.
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1227700
>>
>>
>> I've committed a deprecated, overloaded constructor for the previous
>> arguments in r1237168, which resolves this clirr error, while leaving
>> ResultStatus as now being static.
>>
>> Hopefully that's the right thing to have done! It felt better than putting
>> the class back to not being static, which was giving findbugs warnings,
>> which is why Simone changed it
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to