Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> The compress component shall become a proper Commons component:
[x] +1 Yes
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additi
+1 from me
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> +1
> Oliver
>
> Stefan Bodewig schrieb:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
>> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
>> on the old Jakarta template
+1
2009/3/13 Stefan Bodewig
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view
+1
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=mark
+1, it has currently more traffic and community support than some of the
proper components ;-)
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta temp
I'd like to add a comment to my vote :) Compress seems to have a
momentum at the moment from several committer and contributors. I
haven't been looking at the quality of patches/contributions submitted
but I would hope that the committers involved would be looking to
propose people to become commit
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar
>> wrote:
>>> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
>>
>> I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted
+1
Oliver
Stefan Bodewig schrieb:
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&
Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=marku
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar
> wrote:
>> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
>
> I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this
> way on the SCXML promotion then it would never have got
+1 knowing that most ad-hoc attempts to implement archive handling is
broken ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on th
+1
On 13/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > +1 from me.
>
> Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
> is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
>
>
> > If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promo
On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> +1 from me.
Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
> If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promotions then
> we should probably shut down the sandbox because
+1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> From: Niall Pemberton
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 6:40 AM
> +1 from me.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Henri Ya
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this
way on the SCXML promotion then it would never have got out of the
sandbox (and that would have been a shame IMO).
Niall
>
+1 from me.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +0 (meaning I'm in favour, but as I don't plan to be involved in the
> short term then I won't vote +1; this being one of the few votes where
> I think a +1 = "Yes and I'm going to volunteer time").
If only pmc members planning
+0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
-Rahul
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
On 2009-03-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&pathrev=753102
> The compress component shall become a proper Commons component:
> [X] +1 Yes
> [ ] -1 No
Stefan
+0 (meaning I'm in favour, but as I don't plan to be involved in the
short term then I won't vote +1; this being one of the few votes where
I think a +1 = "Yes and I'm going to volunteer time").
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOS
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&pathrev=753102
RAT only flags a few
21 matches
Mail list logo
