On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected]> wrote: > +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this way on the SCXML promotion then it would never have got out of the sandbox (and that would have been a shame IMO). Niall > -Rahul > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox >> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based >> on the old Jakarta template: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&pathrev=753102 >> >> RAT only flags a few test input files as files with missing licenses. >> >> The vote will run for a week. >> >> Stefan >> >> -- ballot -- >> >> The compress component shall become a proper Commons component: >> >> [ ] +1 Yes >> [ ] -1 No >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
