Cancelled [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Phil Steitz
Seems there is not support to do this at this time. Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
This is precisely why this vote is premature. As I said, without having looked at the code it is hard for me to understand why UUID stuff would be so complicated that it shouldn't be part of lang. The single class I referenced earlier that I added to Log4j, with perhaps a couple of other methods t

Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/22/11 2:01 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers >> willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state. So I >> would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. >> >> Votes, please

Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers > willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state. So I > would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. > > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, or if there are

[DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I think this vote is slightly premature. Jorg expressed a desire to strip it of some things to move it into lang. I've not had a chance to look at the id code to figure out what I'd like to do. Ralph On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > We seem to have some renewed interest in

Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
+1 and happy to help. On 22 November 2011 14:46, Phil Steitz wrote: > We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers > willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state. So I > would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. > > Votes, please. This vote

Re: [VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 Promote [id] to Commons proper On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers > willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state.  So I > would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. > > Votes, p

[VOTE] Promote [id] to Commons proper

2011-11-22 Thread Phil Steitz
We seem to have some renewed interest in [id] and some volunteers willing to step up to help get it into a releasable state. So I would like to propose that we promote [id] to commons proper. Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, or if there are violent objections before then. Phil