Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 as well http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > +1 > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > On 06.03.12 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> >> Commons CSV

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
+1 Siegfried Goeschl On 06.03.12 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper. There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: - Handle CSV headers,

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Matt Benson
As the original creator of [flatfile] it would be interesting to see how difficult it would be to make [flatfile] do any of the things that [csv] can currently do; e.g. [flatfile] can already handle a delimited column structure. On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, > >

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, IMHO if you could implement the readers as XMLReader instances, you can get benefit from the powerful Digester matching rules and POJOs mapping. I had a spike with Digester reading JSON via a javacc grammar but it was not complete so never proposed it. just my 0.002 cents, -Simo http

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 07/03/2012 12:57, sebb a écrit : > > > Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes, >> would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons >> component? >> > > [csv] is still small but will probably incre

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 07/03/2012 12:57, sebb a écrit : Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes, would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons component? [csv] is still small but will probably increase in size as more features are integrated (like the bean mapping). I p

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. CSV is the name of the least surprise ...even if it supports e.g. TSV as well. I would keep the name just for user to find it. Especially as the line between CSV/TSV/TXT is quite blurry. > Since CSV is currently only a sing

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-07 Thread sebb
On 7 March 2012 07:04, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> >> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman wrote: I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. >>> >>> Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a g

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman wrote: >>> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. >> >> Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to >> revisit that discussion. >> >> It wo

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 06/03/2012 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers, a CSV AP

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Ralph Goers
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote: > On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman wrote: >> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. > > Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to > revisit that discussion. > > It would solve any package name clashe

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Let's start a separate thread for naming then. Gary On Mar 6, 2012, at 20:43, James Carman wrote: > I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. > It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with > a more generic name. I'm +1 for moving it out of the

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread sebb
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman wrote: > I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to revisit that discussion. It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it csv2 or whatever. > It's

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread James Carman
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with a more generic name. I'm +1 for moving it out of the sandbox. It needs a bit of polish before a release, though, IMHO. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Emmanu

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CS

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 06/03/2012 22:09, Gary Gregory a écrit : Let's not hesitate to go to Java 6 if it helps. Gary I do consider Java 6. I'm pondering if Commons CSV can be plugged with JAXB to implement the bean parsing. Emmanuel Bourg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to m

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread sebb
+1 On 6 March 2012 19:35, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > +1 > > On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general >> interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons >> proper. >> >> There are a few points I'd like

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers, a CSV A

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/06/2012 06:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers, a CSV AP

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 Unfortunately I cannot offer help, I am totally out of time On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few poin

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons > proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers,

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general > interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper. > > There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: > - Handle CSV headers,

Re: [VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Elijah Zupancic
I'm not an committer, but I've been monitoring the CSV project for a couple of years and I'm really happy to see it trying to emerge from the sandbox. If it does go to release, I will be dropping OpenCsv and switching to it for my projects both personal and professional. Please accept my virtual +

[VOTE] Promote [csv] to Commons proper

2012-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper. There are a few points I'd like to address before a release: - Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to me without this - Examine the fea