On 7 March 2012 07:04, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> >> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >>>> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. >>> >>> Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to >>> revisit that discussion. >>> >>> It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it >>> csv2 or whatever. >>> >> >> Yeah. How about Commons Solr. >> >> not serious of course. > > ROFL > > ;-)
Slightly more serious: Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes, would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons component? For example, Codec? One could look on the parsing as decoding the input, and (at least some of) the formats as encoding. [This would solve the package name issue.] Just a thought. There are ways around the jar size if that is considered to be a problem (e.g. Net releases its FTP code as a separate jar as well as combined). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
