On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 01:1
+1 for both
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> Here's my +1 to both too.
>
> On 14 March 2011 00:08, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> +1 for both
>>
>> Thanks for doing this, Sebb!
>
> No problem...
>
> (though there were a
Here's my +1 to both too.
On 14 March 2011 00:08, Phil Steitz wrote:
> +1 for both
>
> Thanks for doing this, Sebb!
No problem...
(though there were a few issues getting it all to work- I learnt quite
a lot about Maven in the process ...)
> Phil
> On 3/11/11 8:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Please may
+1 to both.
-Rahul
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Par
+1 for both
Thanks for doing this, Sebb!
Phil
On 3/11/11 8:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 March 2011 00:23, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> OK +1 from me then.
>
> Is that +1 for Skin and +1 for Parent?
Yes, +1 to both
Niall
>> Niall
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>>> I'd just like to press along to p
On 13 March 2011 00:23, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> OK +1 from me then.
Is that +1 for Skin and +1 for Parent?
> Niall
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I'd just like to press along to pick up the new vers of plugins. We
>> can fiddle the tm for the next go around.
>>
>>
OK +1 from me then.
Niall
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'd just like to press along to pick up the new vers of plugins. We
> can fiddle the tm for the next go around.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mar 12, 2011, at 18:06, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> Looks OK to me. The only thing is
I'd just like to press along to pick up the new vers of plugins. We
can fiddle the tm for the next go around.
Gary
On Mar 12, 2011, at 18:06, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Looks OK to me. The only thing is IMO we should wait on the outcome
> from Phil's trademark enquiry before releasing these. I ju
On 12 March 2011 23:06, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Looks OK to me. The only thing is IMO we should wait on the outcome
> from Phil's trademark enquiry before releasing these.
OK. It's easy to change again if necessary.
> I just tried it
> out on Commons IO and saw the following footer on every pag
Looks OK to me. The only thing is IMO we should wait on the outcome
from Phil's trademark enquiry before releasing these. I just tried it
out on Commons IO and saw the following footer on every page:
"Apache Commons, Apache Commons IO, Commons IO, Apache, the Apache
feather logo, and the Apache Co
Le 12/03/2011 04:18, sebb a écrit :
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Parent fails, but
> Commons Skin
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>>
>> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
>> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>>
>> If th
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Parent fails, but
> Com
Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
referenced from Commons Parent 19.
If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Parent fails, but
Commons Skin can be released without Commons Parent, so please
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb wrote:
On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wro
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/bin
On 11 March 2011 09:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
>>> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
any more. Not sure what's caused
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
>>> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
>>> Nexus this is an
On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
>> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
>> Nexus this is an issue.
>
> AFAIK, that's not something that was cha
On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
> Nexus this is an issue.
AFAIK, that's not something that was changed between 18 => 19 is it?
When did it last
The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
Nexus this is an issue.
Niall
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
> - logos now mostly h
Hi Seb,
since we're discussing about it, I think it could be a good idea
distributing an artifact containing the assembly descriptors to
generate required binary packages for downloads, as described on[1],
and declare the assembly plugin directly in the commons-parent.
Components that need extra de
I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
- logos now mostly have TMs, so need to change default
and parent
- don't claim Commons as a trademark
I'll start a new vote later.
If there are any other issues which have not been reported, please do
so ASAP so I can incorporate any
Safari.
On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built.
>>> I didn't see a TM anywhere though.
>>
>> Oh, that't not good.
>>
>> Can you upl
On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:09, sebb wrote:
> On 8 March 2011 22:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I also added a TM to the commons-skin's [commons] logo. In SVN.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Can you provide brief details of what you used to add the TM in case
> others want to do it?
> Also what font and size etc did you
On 9 March 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
>> didn't see a TM anywhere though.
>
> Oh, that't not good.
>
> Can you upload the site to your personal people dir?
> Or e-mail me a zi
On 8 March 2011 22:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I also added a TM to the commons-skin's [commons] logo. In SVN.
Thanks.
Can you provide brief details of what you used to add the TM in case
others want to do it?
Also what font and size etc did you use, so I can change the overlay
accordingly.
> Gar
On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
> didn't see a TM anywhere though.
Oh, that't not good.
Can you upload the site to your personal people dir?
Or e-mail me a zip privately (pom+site.xml+site) so I can take a
After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
didn't see a TM anywhere though.
Ralph
On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the updates to Commons
> Skin and Commons Parent.
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> https://repos
I also added a TM to the commons-skin's [commons] logo. In SVN.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> I did this because of the branding requirements:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#graphics
>
>
> On 8 March 2011 21:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > My preference is to
Ironic that the page does not follow its own graphics branding requirement.
G
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> I did this because of the branding requirements:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#graphics
>
>
> On 8 March 2011 21:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > My preferen
I see. Here is what I am talking about for codec:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/site/resources/images/logo.png
Where is the commons logo? In commons-skin?
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> I did this because of the branding requirements:
>
>
I did this because of the branding requirements:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#graphics
On 8 March 2011 21:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> My preference is to remove the two TMs I see near the logos.
>
> You do not see TMs, Rs, and SMs all over the place on http://www.apple.com/
> for e
My preference is to remove the two TMs I see near the logos.
You do not see TMs, Rs, and SMs all over the place on
http://www.apple.com/for example.
It's not appleaing visually either IMO.
If we were truly worried about it, someone should stick TMs in the logos.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:5
On 8 March 2011 19:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The TM on the Commons URL is in the wrong place:
> http://yfrog.com/f/h20qjd3j/
So where should it be?
It can be placed anywhere, by suitable choice of top/bottom/left/right.
> IMO, the TM should be in the graphics themselves. Much more reusable that
The TM on the Commons URL is in the wrong place:
http://yfrog.com/f/h20qjd3j/
IMO, the TM should be in the graphics themselves. Much more reusable that
way.
Gary
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the updates to Commons
> Skin and Common
+1, works with [codec] in SVN.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> Note: to test this you need to change the POM to reference commons-parent
> 19.
>
> As this is not yet in an official repo, you will need to add the
> following repository definition to your settings.xml:
>
>
Note: to test this you need to change the POM to reference commons-parent 19.
As this is not yet in an official repo, you will need to add the
following repository definition to your settings.xml:
Nexus
true
Nexus
https://repo
On 8 March 2011 06:17, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Should we be claiming trademark on 'Commons'?
I wondered about that.
This is trivial to change, and only affects Commons Parent.
(and if a component wants to override it, they can add their own
version of the section to their site.xml)
I'll leave t
Should we be claiming trademark on 'Commons'?
Like Incubator & Attic it seems like something we want to continue
encouraging as a de facto standard instead of subjecting to trademark
protection.
Hen
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the
Pardon me for being dense, but what do I put in my POM to test this?
Gary
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the updates to Commons
> Skin and Commons Parent.
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
I think the time has come to formally vote on the updates to Commons
Skin and Commons Parent.
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-008/org/apache/commons/
SVN
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-skin/tags/commons-skin-3-RC2/
and
43 matches
Mail list logo
