[RESULT][VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 (take 2)

Hello All, I'm closing the VOTE, 72 hours are over The VOTE was successful, it receives 3 binding +1 Rob Tompkins, Gary Gregory, Gilles Sadowski On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 20:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 12:23, Maxim Solodovnik a > écrit : > > > > This is a [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 (take 2)

Hi. Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 12:23, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing > Apache Commons collections 4.3 > > Tag name: > collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag > -v') > > Previous RC2 VOTE was canceled due to long discussion regarding >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 (take 2)

+1 >From the RC tag: RAT Check OK. Building on Java 11 OK with: mvn -V clean package site -Dcommons.jacoco.version=0.8.3 Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3; 2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\.. Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Co

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 (take 2)

Doh…pardon the noise….reading through the emails just now. +1 (binding) signatures all match, rat, good, java8, java11 both work with tests (Assuming you upversion jacoco for 11), and I believe that with japicmp, the clirr failures are no longer valid. -Rob > On Jan 31, 2019, at 6:23 AM, Ma

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 6:22 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > The VOTE in this thread has been canceled Just copy and paste in the RC2 original [VOTE] email, and re-start it. I’ll +1 it. > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 16:11, sebb wrote: > >> +1, it has become very messy >> >> Cancel this vote

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 4:11 AM, sebb wrote: > > +1, it has become very messy One way or another I am a +1 (binding). I’ve tested the signatures, and the builds in java8 and java11. Both work. You guys can decide how you want to proceed with the documentation of the [VOTE]. -Rob > > Cancel

[VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 (take 2)

This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons collections 4.3 Tag name: collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') Previous RC2 VOTE was canceled due to long discussion regarding Clirr report [1]. To resolve this Japicmp report has been created [2] as well simp

[CANCELED] [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

The VOTE in this thread has been canceled On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 16:11, sebb wrote: > +1, it has become very messy > > Cancel this vote thread and start another > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 08:42, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > Hello Maxim. > > > > Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 05:42, Maxim Solodovni

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

+1, it has become very messy Cancel this vote thread and start another On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 08:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello Maxim. > > Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 05:42, Maxim Solodovnik a > écrit : > > > > This release need your VOTES :))) > > The contents on which to vote is buried wit

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

Hello Maxim. Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 05:42, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > This release need your VOTES :))) The contents on which to vote is buried within many levels of indentation; could you please post a clean message, with links to the RC files, BC test, and the conclusion of this long disc

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

This release need your VOTES :))) On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 19:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > Thanks to the Rob, I was able to create "compatibility report" using > japicmp > It looks green :) > > Would it be OK if I will replace clirr report in generated site with > japicmp report? >

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

I believe that the [VOTE] thread is still out there. As I’ve already done build validation, I’m going to do signature validation now. I’ll dig the thread up and add my vote. -Rob > On Jan 30, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 14:56, Maxim Solodovnik

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 14:56, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > Latest version of test [2] shows all errors are false positive Great; I missed that (sorry). Then, there is no reason to change the major version number. Is this still the [VOTE] thread? Regards, Gilles > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

The RC seems fine. The new test can be added post release. Gary On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 08:23 Gilles Sadowski Hi. > > Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 13:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2019, at 1:12 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > It seems my prev

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Latest version of test [2] shows all errors are false positive On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 20:23, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 13:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2019, at 1:12 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Hi. Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 13:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > > > On Jan 30, 2019, at 1:12 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > It seems my previous post was missed somehow > > so will re-post here: > > > > I have added japicmp report here: [1] is has none issues > > > > What

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

> On Jan 30, 2019, at 1:12 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Hello All, > > It seems my previous post was missed somehow > so will re-post here: > > I have added japicmp report here: [1] is has none issues > What do folks think about [1]? It looks much more promising than the clirr report.

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Hello All, It seems my previous post was missed somehow so will re-post here: I have added japicmp report here: [1] is has none issues Additionally I have updated gist [2] it also show there are no issues In case this is not enough I propose to cancel RC2 and to release 5.0 [1] https://dist.ap

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

The bottom line is that new interface method in Collections 4.3 MUST be default methods to avoid blowing up code. This is possible since Collection now requires Java 8. Gary On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:53 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:35 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > On Mon, 28

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:21 PM Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Am 28.01.2019 um 20:01 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > > Before I vote on the the thread, does adding a method to an interface > cause BC to break? > > "Adding a method to an interface does not break compatibility with > pre-existing binaries." >

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Hello All, I have added japicmp report here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collections/4.3-RC2/site/japicmp.html I see no issues here :( On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 03:03, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:36 AM sebb wrote: > > > Haven't looked at the code, but if

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:36 AM sebb wrote: > > Haven't looked at the code, but if it's being compiled for java 8, and > > the new methods have a default implementation, then it's fine. clirr > > just complains because it's too old to know about default methods. > > I don't think so. > > I think

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

> On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:35 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 19:22, Marcelo Vanzin > wrote: >> >> Haven't looked at the code, but if it's being compiled for java 8, and >> the new methods have a default implementation, then it's fine. clirr >> just complains because it's too old to

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 19:22, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > > Haven't looked at the code, but if it's being compiled for java 8, and > the new methods have a default implementation, then it's fine. clirr > just complains because it's too old to know about default methods. I don't think so. I think Cli

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Ok good enough. Then I’ll finish up looking at the signatures in a bit. Will be spotty today. I’m flying from Florida back to Virginia. -Rob > On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:22 PM, Marcelo Vanzin > wrote: > > Haven't looked at the code, but if it's being compiled for java 8, and > the new methods hav

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Haven't looked at the code, but if it's being compiled for java 8, and the new methods have a default implementation, then it's fine. clirr just complains because it's too old to know about default methods. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:18 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > @Marcelo - Many thanks...Yes. Tha

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Am 28.01.2019 um 20:01 schrieb Rob Tompkins: Before I vote on the the thread, does adding a method to an interface cause BC to break? "Adding a method to an interface does not break compatibility with pre-existing binaries." Source: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

@Marcelo - Many thanks...Yes. That makes sense. Thanks. Seems like this release should be a -1 then because we’re breaking BC without a major version change. Right?? -Rob > On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Marcelo Vanzin > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:01 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Befo

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:01 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > Before I vote on the the thread, does adding a method to an interface cause > BC to break? I would think not. All of the clirr errors are merely additions. > Further the JAPICMP report confirms this. Existing classes that implement the inte

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Before I vote on the the thread, does adding a method to an interface cause BC to break? I would think not. All of the clirr errors are merely additions. Further the JAPICMP report confirms this. I’m validating the remainder of the release now, and wanted to ask the above question before adding

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

Hello All, Thanks to the Rob, I was able to create "compatibility report" using japicmp It looks green :) Would it be OK if I will replace clirr report in generated site with japicmp report? Or I need to restart the VOTE? On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 20:48, Gary Gregory wrote: > We might as well sta

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Thanks a million! On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 00:07, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Sure. > > I cloned down your tag, added these lines to the pom.xml: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-text/blob/master/pom.xml#L59-L63 > > and > > https://github.com/apache/commons-text/blob/master/pom.xml#L132-L138 > (exc

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Sure. I cloned down your tag, added these lines to the pom.xml: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/blob/master/pom.xml#L59-L63 and https://github.com/apache/commons-text/blob/master/pom.xml#L132-L138 (except just in the plugins part of the build section) then you run mvn japicmp:cmp I c

Re: JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Hello Rob, can you please share brief how-to, so I can regenerate the report? :) On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 02:04, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Just an FYI, I hacked this together for the sake of reporting on solomax’s > work: > > Cheers, > -Rob > > > > > On Jan 20, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote

JAPICMP Collections-4.3-RC2 report pdf (Was: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3)

Just an FYI, I hacked this together for the sake of reporting on solomax’s work: Cheers, -Rob > On Jan 20, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We might as well start with releasing fresh versions of our internal maven > plugins, then commons-parent, then components... ;-) More work for

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

We might as well start with releasing fresh versions of our internal maven plugins, then commons-parent, then components... ;-) More work for the RM! :-) Gary On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:06 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le dim. 20 janv. 2019 à 04:56, Maxim Solodovnik a > écrit : > > > > I can see

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

Le dim. 20 janv. 2019 à 04:56, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > I can see there is activity with replacing clirr with japicmp, maybe it > worth to hold this release until commons-parent v48 will be released? You are the manager. :-) Gilles > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 05:52, Gilles Sadowski wrote:

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

I can see there is activity with replacing clirr with japicmp, maybe it worth to hold this release until commons-parent v48 will be released? On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 05:52, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le sam. 19 janv. 2019 à 11:36, Maxim Solodovnik a > écrit : > > > > I'm afraid I need help

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

Hi. Le sam. 19 janv. 2019 à 11:36, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > I'm afraid I need help with this > since I don't understand why clirr reports these errors Nobody knows around here; but your test demonstrates that one of the errors is a false positive. So I suggest that, for good measure, you a

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t; > > release. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Alternatively, we c

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

; > > >> > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > >> > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t; > >> > > > > > > > > these > > > > >> > > > > > > > > errors. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > For this re

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t; to > > > >> > > > > > > > > have > > > >> > > > > > > > > revapi replacing clirr. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

gt; > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/commit/482762a13f739631f94d03642b0a55a9b7214c44 > > >>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

9 at 11:53 AM Amey Jadiye < > >> > > ameyjad...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> I spared little time on finding issue howe

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t/482762a13f739631f94d03642b0a55a9b7214c44 > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > Amey > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:53 AM Amey Jadiye &l

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> > > > > > > > >> any >> > > > > > > > >> issues. also I saw that few other apache commons modules >> > > having >> > > > > same >> > > > > > > > >> issue &g

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > >> Amey > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, 12:31 pm Maxim Solodovnik &l

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

ked clirr report one more time > > > > > > > >>> This time I took 1 error and perform investigation: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> "Method 'public java.util.Colle

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

; > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> In fact I don't understand why this error was reported > > > > > > >>> BidiMap extends java.util.Map > > > > > > >>> Map has method "public ja

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> > >>> Map has method "public java.util.Collection values()" in all > > > > > >>> versions: > > > > > >>> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Map.html > > > > > >>> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Map.html > > > > &

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

l > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Maybe its clirr issue? > > > > >>> Would appreciate any help with this investigation > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 16:53, Gilles < > gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

are caused by previous > > > >>> > > release > > > >>> > > 4.3 doesn't introduce any new errors ... > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/l7ftxlvdk4yqxijt > > > >>>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

; > 4.3 doesn't introduce any new errors ... > > >>> > > > > >>> > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/l7ftxlvdk4yqxijt > > >>> > > > >>> > I had seen the post but it says: > > >>> > --- > > >>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

ave been mentioned in the release notes > >>> > and/or the [VOTE] email, in order to avoid further questioning. > >>> > > >>> > Is the cause the change of supported JDK? > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

nges comparing to > >>> 4.2 > >>> > --- > >>> > > >>> > But IMHO it was not a conclusion: If the cause of the errors was > >>> > identified, it could have been mentioned in the release notes > >>> > and/or the [VOTE] email, in order to avoid further questioning. >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

changes comparing to > >>> 4.2 > >>> > --- > >>> > > >>> > But IMHO it was not a conclusion: If the cause of the errors was > >>> > identified, it could have been mentioned in the release notes > >>> >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

; > Is there anything wrong with the RC? > >> > > >> >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 05:20, Bruno P. Kinoshita > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> FWIW I had a similar experience, and realized I was doing `git > >> fetch --all`, but it di

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

; > >> -Rob >> > >> >> > >> > On Dec 30, 2018, at 12:25 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > No votes after 3 days :( >> > >> > Is there anything wro

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

I am slowly coming back to FOSS setting up a new laptop and house... may someone summarize where we stand on this vote? Gary On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:42 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing > Apache Commons collections 4.3 > > Tag name: > collections-4.3-RC2 (signatu

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t; > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> FWIW I had a similar experience, and realized I was doing `git > > >> fetch --all`, but it didn't bring the tags. `git fetch --tags` did the > > >> trick. After that I could `git check

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

tonight or in the morning. > >> >> > >> >> -Rob > >> >> > >> >> > On Dec 30, 2018, at 12:25 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > No votes after 3 days :( > >> >> > Is there anything wrong with the RC? >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

>> >> FWIW I had a similar experience, and realized I was doing `git >> fetch --all`, but it didn't bring the tags. `git fetch --tags` did the >> trick. After that I could `git checkout $tag-name` >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> B

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

FWIW I had a similar experience, and realized I was doing `git >> fetch --all`, but it didn't bring the tags. `git fetch --tags` did the >> trick. After that I could `git checkout $tag-name` >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Bruno >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

zed I was doing `git > >> fetch --all`, but it didn't bring the tags. `git fetch --tags` did the > >> trick. After that I could `git checkout $tag-name` > >> >> > >> >> Cheers > >> >> Bruno > >> >> > >> >> > >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

>> >> >> >> >> From: Gilles >> To: dev@commons.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2018 9:26 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 >> >> >> >>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

t; >> > >> ________ > >> From: Gilles > >> To: dev@commons.apache.org > >> Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2018 9:26 AM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 > >> > >> > >> &g

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

>> From: Gilles >> To: dev@commons.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2018 9:26 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 >> >> >> >>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 21:21:34 +0100, Gilles wrote: >>> Hi. >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

26 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 21:21:34 +0100, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:41:59 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing >> Apache Commons collections 4.3 >> >> Tag name: >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

From: Maxim Solodovnik To: Commons Developers List Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2018 2:42 AM Subject: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons collections 4.3 Tag name: collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

unday, 30 December 2018 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 No votes after 3 days :( Is there anything wrong with the RC? On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 05:20, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > > FWIW I had a similar experience, and realized I was doing `git fetch --all`, >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

> could `git checkout $tag-name` > > Cheers > Bruno > > > > > > From: Gilles > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2018 9:26 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 > > > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

y, 27 December 2018 9:26 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3 On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 21:21:34 +0100, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:41:59 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing >> Apache Commons collections 4.3 >>

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 21:21:34 +0100, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:41:59 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons collections 4.3 Tag name: collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') $ git tag -v collections-

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

Hi. On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:41:59 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons collections 4.3 Tag name: collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') $ git tag -v collections-4.3-RC2 error: tag 'collections-4.3-RC2' not found.

[VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons collections 4.3 Tag name: collections-4.3-RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') RC1 was cancelled due to some release steps were not done Tag URL: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-collections.git;a=commit;h=7