Re: [Math] Not releasing 3.X (Was: Linear Programming in Math [...])

2018-01-02 Thread Bill Igoe
Sure, Would love to incorporate additional statistical routines, time series analysis and the like. The underlying code is very stable and adding more routines would aid in robustness and versatility. I find myself writing my own. For instance ARIMA is simply a variation of your MultivariateFunc

Re: [Math] Not releasing 3.X (Was: Linear Programming in Math [...])

2018-01-02 Thread Rob Tompkins
Ok. Was just trying to make a suggestion to think about shooting for incremental changes specifically with [math] to go along with all of the good work with the other mathematical projects. -Rob > On Jan 2, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Gilles wrote: > > Hello. > > On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:27:00 -0500, Rob

Re: [Math] Not releasing 3.X (Was: Linear Programming in Math [...])

2018-01-02 Thread Eric Barnhill
I would be happy to help create Commons-Stat as I use those functions all the time. Eric

[Math] Not releasing 3.X (Was: Linear Programming in Math [...])

2018-01-02 Thread Gilles
Hello. On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:27:00 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jan 1, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Bill Igoe wrote: Hi Gang, I noted a recent exchange on OLS regarding Math Commons. Thus far I find the Math Commons working flawlessly. I am also working on a project for pure real time financial op