Hello.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:27:00 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jan 1, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Bill Igoe <billi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Gang,
I noted a recent exchange on OLS regarding Math Commons. Thus far I
find
the Math Commons working flawlessly. I am also working on a project
for
pure real time financial optimization using the Linear Programming
algorithm of Math commons. I designed my code to flip between the
QSOPT
package and the Math common LP algo to check the robustness and
consistency
of results. I get exactly same answers in both and that LP is
using over
2000 variables and 3000 constraints!
Many thanks for the encouragement.
All - any thoughts on trying to do a release on [math] is the 3.X
branch stable?
This branch is unsupported; making a new release based on it will
send the wrong signal and is likely to generate bug reports already
filed on "master" (with "Fix version" set to 4.0), and sometimes
fixed there (or in "RNG" or in "Numbers").
You'd basically scratch almost 3 years of continuous work:
---CUT---
commit e4e1ac23c734f65686be4bc0e503f82f941afd4d
Author: Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Feb 16 23:37:23 2015 +0100
Update for next development iteration: commons-math4
---CUT---
Are there any small bug fixes we can do to make small
incremental changes and release those?
Any time spent on back-porting fixes from "master" will be better
used for advancing towards the release of "Commons Numbers", and
other components with supported (reviewed and fixed) codes,
according to the "plan" (cf. ML archive for details).
Help welcome.
-Rob
Keep up the good work and I am looking forward to the 'split'
between
Commons Math and Statistics.
As outlined in another thread, high-level functionalities with
positive feedback, like the one referred to here, can be ported
to a new component, with low-level supporting codes (but possibly
buggy) being hidden in "internal" packages until they are ported
(or released) themselves.
Comments, and help with experimenting, on this approach welcome.
E.g. the contents of "o.a.c.m.stat.regression" would become a
module of "Commons Stat".
Cheers to you all and have a great 2018
Thanks and best regards,
Gilles
Bill Igoe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
