Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-02-07 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary Original message From: Duncan Jones Date:02/07/2014 05:48 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3 On 31 January 2014 07:54, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Nice discussion. Thanks for clearing this up. So Duncan: go ahead if you &g

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-02-07 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014-02-07 Duncan Jones : > On 31 January 2014 07:54, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Nice discussion. Thanks for clearing this up. So Duncan: go ahead if you > > got the time. > > Hi Benedikt, > > Based on other discussions on the ML, the fix for LANG-341 belongs in > the Conversion class. I think th

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-02-07 Thread Duncan Jones
On 31 January 2014 07:54, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Nice discussion. Thanks for clearing this up. So Duncan: go ahead if you > got the time. Hi Benedikt, Based on other discussions on the ML, the fix for LANG-341 belongs in the Conversion class. I think this warrants a larger piece of work to imp

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Nice discussion. Thanks for clearing this up. So Duncan: go ahead if you got the time. 2014/1/31 Duncan Jones > On 31 January 2014 04:37, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Read section 5 of the license. > > Ok, that's pretty clear-cut then. To save others from dragging up the > wording: > > "5. Submiss

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-30 Thread Duncan Jones
On 31 January 2014 04:37, Henri Yandell wrote: > Read section 5 of the license. Ok, that's pretty clear-cut then. To save others from dragging up the wording: "5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Wor

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-30 Thread Henri Yandell
Read section 5 of the license. On Jan 30, 2014 10:16 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > I'm not sure whether providing a patch for an AL licensed file is > automatically licensed under AL as well. In the end the raw diff file does > not contain the AL header, so you're better of with an ICLA. > > Be

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I'm not sure whether providing a patch for an AL licensed file is automatically licensed under AL as well. In the end the raw diff file does not contain the AL header, so you're better of with an ICLA. Benedikt 2014/1/27 Henri Yandell > Depends whose arguing probably :) > > Our license gives u

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Henri Yandell
Depends whose arguing probably :) Our license gives us a right to contributions under Apache 2.0 unless stated otherwise; the ICLA is playing safer. We can also simply take anything under a compatible license and include (with suitable licensing). I did that for a method from Spring. Hen On Sun

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Duncan Jones
On 26 January 2014 19:47, Duncan Jones wrote: > On 26 January 2014 18:49, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hi Duncan, >> >> >> 2014/1/26 Duncan Jones >> >>> On 26 January 2014 13:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > we've fixed some bugs and we have some nice new features implemented >

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Gary Gregory
Adding more features and fixes is Ok but at this point I'd rather regular early and release often.  G Original message From: Duncan Jones Date:01/26/2014 11:45 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3 On 26 January 2014 13:33, Ben

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Duncan Jones
On 26 January 2014 18:49, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > > 2014/1/26 Duncan Jones > >> On 26 January 2014 13:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > we've fixed some bugs and we have some nice new features implemented >> > (DiffBuilder, Jaro-Winkler Distance, RandomUtils, Clas

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Duncan, 2014/1/26 Duncan Jones > On 26 January 2014 13:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we've fixed some bugs and we have some nice new features implemented > > (DiffBuilder, Jaro-Winkler Distance, RandomUtils, ClassPathUtils), so I'm > > planning to cut a RC in the first week

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Duncan Jones
On 26 January 2014 13:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > we've fixed some bugs and we have some nice new features implemented > (DiffBuilder, Jaro-Winkler Distance, RandomUtils, ClassPathUtils), so I'm > planning to cut a RC in the first week of February. > > I just wanted to know if there i

[LANG] Towards 3.3

2014-01-26 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi all, we've fixed some bugs and we have some nice new features implemented (DiffBuilder, Jaro-Winkler Distance, RandomUtils, ClassPathUtils), so I'm planning to cut a RC in the first week of February. I just wanted to know if there is anything you'd like to have included in the next release. Th