: Benedikt Ritter <
>> brit...@apache.org> Date:03/13/2015 11:17 (GMT-08:00)
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Cc: Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just want to give you an update on what I'm planning next for [lang].
>>
>>
>
> Gary :-)
>
> Original message From: Benedikt Ritter <
> brit...@apache.org> Date:03/13/2015 11:17 (GMT-08:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Cc: Subject: [LANG] Next steps
> Hi all,
>
> I just want to give you an update on what I'm planning next for
I like you'd plan!
Gary :-)
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:03/13/2015 11:17 (GMT-08:00)
To: Commons Developers List Cc:
Subject: [LANG] Next steps
Hi all,
I just want to give you an update on what I'm planning next for [lang].
- I'll rev
Hi all,
I just want to give you an update on what I'm planning next for [lang].
- I'll review the pending patches and commit what is ready to be committed.
- After that I'll cut 3.4 RC1
- After that I'll start the git migration (I hope that I have information
about the github badges [1] until the
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello Hen
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>> > >
>> > > >
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm +1 for calendar defined minor releases btw. I think we should
2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Hen
> >
> >
> > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> >
> > > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want
> t
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Hen
>
>
> 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>
> > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
> > have a 3.3.
>
>
> I'm working on getting
y >wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to it all.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> ---- Original message
> >> From: Benedikt Ritter
> >> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> >> To: Commons Developers List
> >> Subjec
>> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had
>> expected it to be). I still have to do the
Also +1 to all.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1 to it all.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>
> H
2014/1/2 Duncan Jones
> On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > +1 to it all.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Benedikt Ritter
> > Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers
On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1 to it all.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [LANG] Next steps
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'v
+1 to it all.
Gary
Original message
From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:01/02/2014 05:29 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [LANG] Next steps
Hi all,
I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had
expected it to be). I still
Hi all,
I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had
expected it to be). I still have to do the Jira stuff, will do that tonight
probably.
So, here is what I have in mind for lang as next steps.
Move User Guide from Website to package-info.java:
The user guide is struct
15 matches
Mail list logo