2014/1/15 Benedikt Ritter
>
>
>
> 2014/1/13 Paul Benedict
>
>> Splitting with an empty string doesn't make any sense to me. Nothing
>> should
>> match that -- even an empty string. It's a lack of a token.
>>
>
> Okay, and that's the reason why currently
>
> StringUtils.split("", ".") = [ ]
> but
2014/1/13 Paul Benedict
> Splitting with an empty string doesn't make any sense to me. Nothing should
> match that -- even an empty string. It's a lack of a token.
>
Okay, and that's the reason why currently
StringUtils.split("", ".") = [ ]
but
StringUtils.split("x", ".") = ["x"]
I guess I und
2014/1/15 Gary Gregory
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to change the behavior then, if nobody objects. I'll write some
> > prose for the release notes of 3.3 (which I plan to roll out early
> > February)
> >
>
> Cool.
>
> Do you plan on reviewing all of
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> I'd like to change the behavior then, if nobody objects. I'll write some
> prose for the release notes of 3.3 (which I plan to roll out early
> February)
>
Cool.
Do you plan on reviewing all of [lang], StringUtils, or the subset of
Strin
I'd like to change the behavior then, if nobody objects. I'll write some
prose for the release notes of 3.3 (which I plan to roll out early February)
Benedikt
2014/1/14 sebb
> On 14 January 2014 11:53, Duncan Jones wrote:
> > On 14 January 2014 11:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >> 2014/1/13 Ga
On 14 January 2014 11:53, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 14 January 2014 11:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> 2014/1/13 Gary Gregory
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> > What does the Javadoc say?
>>> >
>>>
>>> The Javadoc describes the current behavior, which is whacky IMO. Thi
I'm all for fixing bugs! ;)
Gary
Original message
From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:01/14/2014 06:17 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [LANG] Handling of empty string in StringUtils
2014/1/13 Gary Gregory
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, seb
On 14 January 2014 11:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014/1/13 Gary Gregory
>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > What does the Javadoc say?
>> >
>>
>> The Javadoc describes the current behavior, which is whacky IMO. This could
>> be a case where the docs documents the code, e
2014/1/13 Gary Gregory
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > What does the Javadoc say?
> >
>
> The Javadoc describes the current behavior, which is whacky IMO. This could
> be a case where the docs documents the code, even though it does not make
> sense.
>
> It sounds dangerous
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> What does the Javadoc say?
>
The Javadoc describes the current behavior, which is whacky IMO. This could
be a case where the docs documents the code, even though it does not make
sense.
It sounds dangerous to change it in a minor release.
Gary
Splitting with an empty string doesn't make any sense to me. Nothing should
match that -- even an empty string. It's a lack of a token.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> ping, any thought on this?
>
>
> 2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while looking through t
What does the Javadoc say?
On 13 January 2014 17:00, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> ping, any thought on this?
>
>
> 2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while looking through the open issues for lang, I came across LANG-823:
>> StringUtils.split should handle empty strings the same as other conte
ping, any thought on this?
2014/1/11 Benedikt Ritter
> Hi,
>
> while looking through the open issues for lang, I came across LANG-823:
> StringUtils.split should handle empty strings the same as other content
> [1]. The request makes sense to me - the empty string should be handled
> like any o
Hi,
while looking through the open issues for lang, I came across LANG-823:
StringUtils.split should handle empty strings the same as other content
[1]. The request makes sense to me - the empty string should be handled
like any other content.
Then I looked into StringUtils to see how other metho
14 matches
Mail list logo
