Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
I've merged this. Thanks for the help, @ansell!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
OK, so I added them as `Set` - it might be an ordered set (e.g.
`LinkedHashSet`).
I merged `RDFA_XHTML` and `RDFA_HTML` and made them return such a set to
include both `text/html` and `a
Github user ansell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
Service discovery for other instances of RDFSyntax/Parsers can be done
separately.
The main objection was for users of the RDFSyntax interface to be able to
offer multiple content types
Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
Let's discuss the mutability etc. of the `RDFParser` factory separate on
dev@commons - that's a general thing which anyway should not affect this pull
request on `RDFSyntax`.
This pull req
