Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/27
OK, so I added them as `Set` - it might be an ordered set (e.g.
`LinkedHashSet`).
I merged `RDFA_XHTML` and `RDFA_HTML` and made them return such a set to
include both `text/html` and `application/xhtml`. Should we redefine
`.equals()` and `hashCode()` to use `uri()` or would that be tricky then for
arbitrary extra RDFSyntax-es? (They could use a `urn:uuid` or something if
they don't know)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
