Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-13 Thread William Speirs
For what it's worth, I am +1 here as well (I was the one who implemented the changed the required Java 1.6). Thanks... Bill- On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. > > As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff,

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff, but not to satisfy the needs of companies who are using outdated jdks. Sometimes it makes sense, but the "for ever support" of jdks becomes obsessive. Rather I would prefer to work with cool te

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
>> I'm tempted to go as far as to say it's irresponsible of us to support 1.5 >> :)> +1 and IMHO innovation blocking as well moreover from the commons homepage: "The Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable Java components." that doesn't mean to me "helping companies on ke

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Oracle declared 1.5 EOL a good while back; ie) no security fixes; why should we encourage users to be on outdated versions? Especially as I think there are pretty big security issues unfixed in 1.5 (the magic floating number crash for example). If you're still on 1.5, you have worse problems than

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 08:20, Henri Yandell wrote: > Tell me why 1.6 is a problem again? Because there are likely to be many companies still using Java 1.5 out there. I was hoping to fix the code so they are not prevented from using the new version. > This is DB-helper code, so much less worried ab

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Tell me why 1.6 is a problem again? This is DB-helper code, so much less worried about use cases like Android. Hen On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, sebb wrote: > I did some experimenting with BeanProcessor to see what would be > involved in providing Java 1.5 support. > > As part of this, I trie

[DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

2012-01-06 Thread sebb
I did some experimenting with BeanProcessor to see what would be involved in providing Java 1.5 support. As part of this, I tried commenting out the new code that requires Java 1.6. All tests still worked. I then commented out most of the rest of the else if clauses in the processColumn method,