Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Phil Steitz
Mark Thomas wrote: From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] I am OK pushing forward directly to 1.3, but given severity of these issues and assuming we may drop 1.4 support, it may be best to push out a 1.2.3 to address them. Personally, I am more interested in the 1.3 release th

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >> >> Is the intention to improve DBCP or just get it to compile and run >> under 1.6? > > Short term (ie this week before I go on holiday) is to get DBCP building on > 1.6 and enable the Gump folks to swit

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 14 January 2009 01:38 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release >>

RE: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Mark Thomas
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > Is the intention to improve DBCP or just get it to compile and run > under 1.6? Short term (ie this week before I go on holiday) is to get DBCP building on 1.6 and enable the Gump folks to switch to a 1.6 JDK. This will a) let Tomcat 5/6 build with a 1.6

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread sebb
On 14/01/2009, sebb wrote: > On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not > > > possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with > > > both Java 1.4 and

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread sebb
On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > > > > Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not > > possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with > > both Java 1.4 and 1.6. > > > > Will that mean moving DBCP to a m

RE: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Mark Thomas
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] > > I am OK pushing forward directly to 1.3, but given severity of these > issues and assuming we may drop 1.4 support, it may be best to push > out > a 1.2.3 to address them. Personally, I am more interested in the 1.3 release than any further 1

RE: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-14 Thread Mark Thomas
> -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] > Sent: 14 January 2009 01:38 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release > > On the issue of not building with JDBC 4.0 / 1.6 JDK (DBCP-191) and &g

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have >> hit >> / seen others hit various issues including: >> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM >> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM be

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread Phil Steitz
Mark Thomas wrote: Folks, DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit / seen others hit various issues including: - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP - Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires

RE: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread Mark Thomas
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not > possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with > both Java 1.4 and 1.6. > > Will that mean moving DBCP to a minimum of Java 1.6? > Or can it be made compatible wit

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread sebb
On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit > / seen others hit various issues including: > - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM > - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP > - Tomcat t

Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit > / seen others hit various issues including: > - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM > - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP

[DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release

2009-01-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Folks, DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit / seen others hit various issues including: - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP - Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires building on a 1.6 JVM