Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
I am OK pushing forward directly to 1.3, but given severity of these
issues and assuming we may drop 1.4 support, it may be best to push
out
a 1.2.3 to address them.
Personally, I am more interested in the 1.3 release th
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>>
>> Is the intention to improve DBCP or just get it to compile and run
>> under 1.6?
>
> Short term (ie this week before I go on holiday) is to get DBCP building on
> 1.6 and enable the Gump folks to swit
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 January 2009 01:38
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release
>>
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>
> Is the intention to improve DBCP or just get it to compile and run
> under 1.6?
Short term (ie this week before I go on holiday) is to get DBCP building on
1.6 and enable the Gump folks to switch to a 1.6 JDK. This will a) let
Tomcat 5/6 build with a 1.6
On 14/01/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> >
> > >
> > > Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not
> > > possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with
> > > both Java 1.4 and
On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>
> >
> > Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not
> > possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with
> > both Java 1.4 and 1.6.
> >
> > Will that mean moving DBCP to a m
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>
> I am OK pushing forward directly to 1.3, but given severity of these
> issues and assuming we may drop 1.4 support, it may be best to push
> out
> a 1.2.3 to address them.
Personally, I am more interested in the 1.3 release than any further 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2009 01:38
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [DBCP] Moving towards a 1.3 release
>
> On the issue of not building with JDBC 4.0 / 1.6 JDK (DBCP-191) and
&g
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have
>> hit
>> / seen others hit various issues including:
>> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
>> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM be
Mark Thomas wrote:
Folks,
DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
/ seen others hit various issues including:
- DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
- Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
- Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>
> Looks like some of the changes to the JDBC API mean that it is not
> possible to create a single version of DBCP which is compatible with
> both Java 1.4 and 1.6.
>
> Will that mean moving DBCP to a minimum of Java 1.6?
> Or can it be made compatible wit
On 13/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
> / seen others hit various issues including:
> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
> - Tomcat t
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
> / seen others hit various issues including:
> - DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
> - Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
Folks,
DBCP seems to have been fairly quiet for a while. In recent days I have hit
/ seen others hit various issues including:
- DBCP doesn't build on a 1.6 JVM
- Tomcat 5/6 can't build on a 1.6 JVM because it depends on building DBCP
- Tomcat trunk (the basis for 7) requires building on a 1.6 JVM
14 matches
Mail list logo